eight-page letter say they go believe it s constitutionally invalid, that it violates precedent and the president s due process rights in saying, no, we are not going to be cooperating with any of your requests. now, they say they re not going to be cooperating, the question is what will they do if, if democrats take that forward and make this a form s impeachment inquiry in the white house s eyes? less they have to change their game plan? they re waiting to see what democrat doss in response. they re gearing up for impeachment behind the scene, the president recruiting someone to be outside counsel. trey gowdy, the former south carolina congressman whoen led the ben gauzy intelligence chairman at the time and gives a sense the white house is gearing up for this to happen, to are this to move forward and for them to prepare for the president to potentially be impeached. kaitlan, thank you. with the setup, legal analysis. jennifer rogers in new york,
want them to change, my question is not what mitch mcconnell does but what democrat doss now. do they propose a counteroffer of any legislation? a longer term daca fix. engage on immigration? actually engage or is the actual instinct to say you know what? we re not going any talking what so ever until you reopen the government. from what i hear, not doing anything until the president reopens the government. they look at this offer he made and say to themselves you ended daca protections, you ended tps protections and your conception to us is to undo some of the damage you created. that s not really a concession. why don t we open the government first? mitch mcconnell will bring a bill up when he wants to bring a bill up as this proves. maybe they can put enough pressure on him to bring a bill to reopen the government. got bring over democrats and keep all republicans together.
part of it is how we view news through our political prisms. you can see the video as a pr republican or democrat and jump to do different conclusions. first is propensity to jump as a nugget of news without waiting for surrounding content. a lot is upsetting about that video. in the past couple hours we ve seen surrounding video and testimony from those making much more nuance and freed to keep those tkeep need to keep those in conversation and you can t separate the larger context from the video. much as we want to say it s one singular incident, anti-semitism are on the rise. a marching of neo-nazis in virginia. not the same as those high school kids, but there is a context in which this happened and people are absorbing that new cycle. it s complicated, nuanced of an issue and cool to at least hold off again and get more video and
more input before we jump to our conclusions. for sure. and i do not see it as complicated or nuanced. i don t see it as democrats looking at it one way or republicans looking at it another way. i think the archdiocese of covington, kentucky, put it straight. these actions of our students are inconsistent with the teachings of our church, and that if we verify that what we ve seen already has happened, we re going to discipline and we may expel these students. we have to speak up. the native american community in america is misunderstood, is disrespected. their contributions to this country of marginalized and we can t make politics, and suggest somehow from a republican or democrat, i think about this differently, depending on who s the target. no. we have to condemn this.