judgment. i will say if we have not tested it now, the way the program is progressing, the deliberateness of it, if they don t have it now, they ll have it shortly. it sounds like once the experts take the data they ll be aebl to get it. and then comes the second claim, if this is a hydrogen bomb, would they be able to put it on an icbm? they have shown pictures. there was a picture of kim jong-un in front of the war head together with what seemed like the cone of a missile. again, that is difficult to prove. nevertheless, given the status of their program, given the way they re developing. if they re not able to do that
counsel probe. the deliberateness of it. also, the ease with which he describes the process that he went through to leaking. because, this is now part of the discussion in washington is was this the first time that he did this? you know, if you think back and you step back, the last six months of drama almost all of it has come from anonymously sourced stories, often mostly wrong but from different members of the intelligence community. and it s a very disturbing question about where all of these are coming from. and i think it opens a new question in to comey himself and whether or not he has ever even done this before. paul: it sounds to me like he is looking for political i mean, he really does he wants mueller to be able to nail trump. that s the implication i take out of this. he wanted that special counsel, and he has teed mueller up to be able to conclude that there was obstruction of justice. that s how i read it. look, if you want to be really cynical, you could make
leaked it to trigger a special counsel probe. the deliberateness of it, this is now part of the discussion in washington, was this the first time that he did this. you know, if you think back and you step back the last six months of drama almost all of it has come from anonymously-sourced stories often mostly wrong but from different members of the intelligence community and it s a very disturbing question about where all of these are coming from and opens up a new question of comey himself and whether or not he s ever done this before. paul: sounds to me that he s look if he wants mueller to be able to nail trump. that s the implication i take out of this. he wanted that special counsel and he has teed mueller up to be able to conclude that there was obstruction of justice. that s how i read it.
it s really perceived to become so politicized over the last eight years, and even before that in the bush administration, so that is a problem. i think for that department. but you are seeing more bruising style of politics to use your word, where if you have that bare majority, you are trying to ram through as much as you can, and the minority party is going to mock that up as much as possible. the fact that they do not have the tools here to do that it s really kind of we can say. it makes it more like political showmanship. rather than actual substantive disagreement and deliberateness. that s what senate should be. jenna: we will talk about what can be positive from this, the american people for the first time are really going to hear from some of these private-sector leaders. they have done extraordinary things about how they feel about america, and what they think they can do to help. that might present some real opportunity. it also will help put some meat on the bones of d
what was his demeanor in that one minute of shooting that he went on? did he say anything? did he looked focused? was there a sense of deliberateness in his action? what were you able to ascertain? two things. when we heard the first shot, or the second, on the third shot people stopped screaming. so when i turned around, he was on his calm. he wasn t looking left. he wasn t looking right. one knee down, pointing and shooting. mostly you would think that, you know, it would be, you know, kind of trying to get everybody. just one shot at a time. he goes one, he didn t smile, didn t cry, didn t say anything, two, three and four. it was very has his calm to do what he did. but his mouth was never open during that period of time i was inside. so let me ask you this as somebody who probably travels a lot, howashis changed you the fact you lived and witnessed something like this?