The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the obligation of the Customs House Agent under Section 13(e) of the CHALR, 2004 cannot be stretched to it.
The tax tribunal held that a sum of Rs 40.45 lakh which was the difference between the stamp duty value on the date of registration of the flat and the agreement value cannot be taxed in the hands of Shyamkumar Madhavdas Chugh hands as ‘Income from other sources’.
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that there is a lack of authority to collect such service tax by the appellant. It would not give the.
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the illegal actions of the importer firms subsequent to the clearance of the cargo from the Customs.
Supreme Court Hiring Of Motor Vehicle Or Cranes Is Not Sale Of Goods If Control Over Equipment Is Retained By Contractor, VAT Can t Be Levied: Supreme Court Case Title: M/s. K.P. Mozika v.