Component shortage has been a known issue for a couple of years in the auto industry and manufacturers are offering credits for features which are being deleted. Credits offered to customers are no
warrant. the bigger question is why they ve taken so long to get the warrant. now he s been given the opportunity to delete some things, which is also a concern. as i read in the affidavit to the warrant. is there a way to find out if somebody has deleted something? what if somebody had attempted to delete something, if there s no warrant, are they allowed to do that? well, he knew that this potentially his phone carries evidence, and so he had that knowledge right after the incident. so anything that he s deleted after that point in time is problematic, especially if it can be proven that the content is material to this investigation and relevant to this investigation. so it really depends on when and what he deleted, but yeah, it shows we should point out there s no information about any deletions at this point, this is just hypothetical. correct, typically when they do a forensic search of the phone they can tell that there s a deletion, what date the files
evidence, and so he had that knowledge right after the incident. so anything that he s deleted after that point in time is problematic, especially if it can be proven that the content is material to this investigation and relevant to this investigation. so it really depends on when and what he deleted, but yeah, it shows we should point out there s no information about any deletions at this point, this is just hypothetical. correct, typically when they do a forensic search of the phone they can tell that there s a deletion, what date the files were deleted and potentially what types of files, were they photographs, messages, emails, et cetera. emails are encrypted so it s a different story. if it can be later what those things were and they are to material to this investigation given that he knew this evidence was something authorities wanted it s problematic for him. it could be helpful if it backs up what he s been saying. 100%. sarah azari, appreciate it,
culpable in this case were deleted. they were deleted intentionally. we notified the federal court of the deletions, which is improper under the rules. the court immediately issue and ex-parte injunction. i might add something you don t know after that hearing with ethan crumbley that you just referenced, we found out that the prosecutor has entered into an agreement with his lawyer to prohibit us, the parents and the attorney, me, who is representing the victims from obtaining evidence from the prosecutor or from ethan crumbley s lawyer. we believe that agreement, that protective order which they entered into is illegal and we re going to the court right now as we speak, the federal court, to prohibit that type of arrangement. we know for some reason the
at protecting younger users from harmful content and addictive behavior. and they are being put in place one day before instagram s ceo is scheduled to testify on capitol hill over the issue. donie o sullivan is here. what s the plan? well, instagram, as you mentioned, instagram are rolling this out. it s not a coincidence. one day before they go to congress. and some folks will cynically say it s so they have something to tell the senators. say we re doing something. here is what some of the features that they are rolling out. they are going to let people know that they should take a break from the app. they re going to take a stricter approach to content they recommend for teenagers. they re going to allow both deletions of photos and videos previous likes and comments, and create an educational hub for parents. which all sounds very well and good, but i think, you know, the company s critics, a lot of