south carolina family. found guilty on all counts in the murder trial of his boyfriend. son. it was so quick and in fact the judge did not offer a dinner. according to reporters in the room, his only living son, buster, sat in the gallery shaking his head in disbelief. but he did not appear to shed a tear. the trial really to turn after the jury saw key piece of evidence. it was a snap to video taken by paul murdoch at the dog kennels just minutes before he and maggie were killed. listen. you are going to hear three separate voices. [indistinct] it is beginning. it is a chicken. come here. catch. laura: he maintained that he was not there. but one witnesses said he was their voice, murdoch admitted the lie. here is why. as my addiction evolved over time, i would get any situations or circumstances where i would get paranoid, thinking, and it could be anything that triggered it. once i told of the line, i mean, i told my family. i have to keep lying. laura: the d
and, the race to save the giant sequoias in yosemite national park as a wildfire threatens trees that have stood for thousands of years. but we start with the january 6 house select committee final push with two more public hearings set to take place this week. this is going to be a really big week for the investigation. committee members are looking to build on the momentum. from the previous six hearings. the next one is set for tomorrow afternoon and will focus on what some panel members call the martialing of the upon. it will include evidence of coordination between former president trump, his top aides and associates, and white nationalists or militia groups such as the proud boys and the oath keepers who, members say, led the assault on the capitol. the thursday hearing will zero in on trump s actions. or inactions as vice president mike pence and house and senate lawmakers and hundreds of police officers came under attack. thursday s hearing is expected to be held in
the matter of hunter biden in the hands of the u.s. attorney for the district of delaware who is appointed in the previous administration, plans not to interfere. the attorney in delaware has he has full authority to make those kind of referrals that you are talking about or to bring cases in other jurisdictions. laura: former fbi assistant director and frequent angle guest chris walker is not buying it. he knows what he is supposed to do. he is the surrogate for the administration. he can pledged that he won t interfere all he wants but there is no reason why the u.s. attorney in delaware should be sitting on this case for well over a year. laura: what is taking so long? joining me now is james comer picture of the house oversight committee. mr. chairman, do you agree that there s something fishy going on with this elongated timeline?
there are a lot of credibility issues here. sometimes the court in delaware has said you have to do something but often times they say well, we will just give you damages and the question is how big are those damages? how big will elon musk damage twitter? this will play out over several months, if not many years come may. what was going on? i wonder in his mind. just making the decision to buy it and then going back. i guess we will see. he bought it on impulse. it seemed impulsive. andrew, it was a horrible idea. i bought it on impulse. it was a horrible business idea. teslas stock went down. i mean, there was no reason. no logical reason why that i should blow $44 billion on twitter. but here is the thing, joe.
and president up 40%. they say you re trying to suppress the vote. we re not. we want to stop rogue counties that created 24 hour voting. it is against the law. two, they also had drive-in voting. it is against the law. we can t have one county running the other 253 counts east. we stopped that and we wanted to make sure we have full verification of mail-in ballots and people who say they are going to vote and voting are who they say they are. we added two hours a day to our early voting. we have two weeks of early voting. two weeks more than delaware has, they have none. this is not voter suppression. it was a strong voter bill. the democrats who now say they want congress to set the laws for states in elections, which we don t accept in texas, they just simply said we re walking out because we don t like the fact we ll lose this vote and unfor naturally the speaker set that bill to come up on the floor four hours before the