indictment. no one has made that allegation. at the end of the day, you have to weigh the damage of the indictment versus the damage of the allegations. it s just not even a fair way. senator marco rubio s evolution on donald trump s access to and handling of classified documents. yeah, i agree, it s not even a close call. you weigh whether you believe as the 11th circuit said that the foundational principle of this country, that no man is above the law, and you balance that against whatever marco was saying we should balance it against. and, you know, willie, i just you will notice you will notice of all of the noise out there, of all of the ground noise, nobody is saying he s innocent. nobody is saying he did not commit the crimes that will put him in jail for over a hundred years, if convicted on all things. i can t think of one person who has said this man did not do it. so what they say is what about hillary? i mean but they had a long time to do that.
oh, my lord, so now he s framed andrew weissmann. i know you want to talk about this. also, if you could talk about e. jean carroll and why that s important as well because she also was holding him accountable. also, how he admitted crimes. again. you re charged with illegal possession, and you give a speech where you say this is why i possessed them. that is actually a confession, not a defense. can that be used in court? absolutely. those statements are admissible. everything that is coming out of his mouth is admissible under the rules of evidence. do you think someone has told him that? i do. his counsel dejour has definitely told him. that s the penalty. you may be doing this for political reasons, but it s going to hurt you in terms of the court. two things happened yesterday outside of miami, which was so interesting, one, jack smith is