To the Lease Agreement or the document, but that would be a future evaluation at that time. But the city would evaluate whether that would require additional ceqa analysis based on the new scope, if they decided to expand beyond whats being studied here. Thats correct. If theres a discretionary ceqa decision, they would have to contemplate additional ceqa review. Thank you, and we often have this case where were not the approving body of the transaction necessarily, but were were looking at the impact from a ceqa standpoint, and i think were comfortable i agree with commissioner moore, that thats been analyzed here, to the extent that goes beyond or the project goes beyond at a later date, wed have to do exactly what we do in other cases. Im sure the city of sausalito is faced with this at times, they adopt a new plan that entails additional ceqa analysis, but the projects arent necessarily before them at that time. So im comfortable with this, i agree with commissioner moore, and id s
Golden Gate National recreation area, and im here on behalf of our superintendent whos vacation this week. I want to acknowledge my colleagues both from the National Parks service as well as our partners with the port and the parks conserveancy who are behind the project here. We appreciate the Planning Departments very thoughtful plans to this project. The National Parks service supports keeping the National Park service em brkation port where it is and weve worked several years closely with the port faf to make this a reality. To and from alcatraz island, pier 31 1 2, we heard earlier discussion about experiences and that is certainly one of the highlights here. Its unfortunate that we do have this disagreement with the city of sausalito, who is a longstanding partner to the park, who weve worked with for many, many years, and this is around this proposal to send two boats from pier 31 1 2 to frisk in the future. The goal for the limited fort Baker Service is to provide an alternativ