the presenter what next? here is the news from bethan holmes. the bbc director general tim davie is to face questions for the first time since an unnamed bbc presenter was accused by the sun newspaper of paying tens of thousands of pounds to a teenager for explicit photos. mr davie will answer questions at the unveiling of the corporation s yearly report. a lawyer representing the now 20 year old at the centre of the story says the allegations are rubbish but the sun says it s seen evidence to back the claims made by the young person s mum. mortgage costs have hit their highest level for 15 years after the rate on a twp year fixed deal surpassed the peak in the aftermath of the mini budget. the average rate on such a deal is now over 6.6% a level not seen since august 2008 and the financial crisis. mps are to vote on changes to the illegal migration bill. amendments put forward by ministers include limits on the detention of unaccompanied children who will be gr
a lawyer representing the young person says the claims are rubbish but the sun says the persons family are standing by their account. mortgage rates have reached their highest level for 15 years. the average 2 year fixed rate has risen to 6.66 per cent surpassing the level reached in the aftermath of liz truss s mini budget. mps are to vote on changes to the illegal migration bill. amendments put forward by ministers include limiting detention periods for children and pregnant women. uk wages have risen at a record yearly rate fuelling fears inflation will stay higherfor longer. pay was 7.3% higher in the three months to may compared with the same time last year. but if you look at inflation in real terms pay fell by 0.8%. novak djokovic will be in action on centre court later for the third day in a row at wimbledon.
policies and due process, it will have an effect on the policies and due process, it will have an effect on the bbc - policies and due process, it will have an effect on the bbc and i have an effect on the bbc and therefore have an effect on the bbc and therefore the have an effect on the bbc and therefore the bbc have an effect on the bbc and therefore the bbc has - have an effect on the bbc and therefore the bbc has to - have an effect on the bbc and therefore the bbc has to take | therefore the bbc has to take action. therefore the bbc has to take action. it therefore the bbc has to take action. it is therefore the bbc has to take action, it isjust therefore the bbc has to take action, it isjust human - therefore the bbc has to take i action, it isjust human beings. therefore the bbc has to take - action, it isjust human beings. it will action, it isjust human beings. will not have an effect if the action, it isjust human beings.- will not have an effect if the name ne
funnelled to what they say is a crack addicted teenager, young person two caring parents who are not being paid. there was no action from the bbc, for the bbc to try now to turn this onto the sun, i think, is misguided. the to turn this onto the sun, i think, is misguided- to turn this onto the sun, i think, is misguided. the bbc is a massive organisation is misguided. the bbc is a massive organisation and is misguided. the bbc is a massive organisation and the is misguided. the bbc is a massive organisation and the bbc is misguided. the bbc is a massive organisation and the bbc coverage| is misguided. the bbc is a massive l organisation and the bbc coverage of this story has been comprehensive and honest. there is the bizarre situation, as you well know, when there is a major bbc story, right on there is a major bbc story, right on the front foot when it comes to doing doorstepping and digging is the bbc. i think that is something we should cherish. the bbc. i think that
sport, people werejust regularly get. show business and sport, people were just name then that you regularly get top footballer, silhouette, top actor, silhouette. so what has changed? the demand silhouette. so what has changed? tie: demand for silhouette. so what has changed? tte: demand for privacy is changed and the realisation of how damaging these claims can be in the paper has made people react and fight more for privacy and also the legal professions take more of an interest, so no privacy is big business and protecting people is big business. 0n the downside sometimes injunctions have taken anything afterwards that was the rich asserting their privilege, but on the good side it does protect people from deformation, which has to be right. the landscape has changed and we are very clear about that, everybody knows that. in the old days the attitudes to be, is it true? well the super smack and if they do, can we afford it? and that they do, can we afford it? and that the saudi new