people are not betting on the huskies, but they looked good in their game. i like wash in this game. i think they have to do what they have been doing all year. and 430 yards passing, and two touchdowns. texas did not register a single sack on him all game, and even when the pocket was collapsing, he sidestepped defenders and kept his eyes downfield, and that s nfl-level type of stuff, and he has been playing in these big games, and high think he will be these washington receivers, although they are the most talented in the country, michigan s defensive backs do play the ball harder and better than texas did, and that will be a challenge. and they are third nationally in passing defensively, and i like washington in this one. we will see about the huskies. we will circle back with you on that prediction.
think that has really been the theme in the second half, after launching england ahead without very early goal, you can feel thejubilation and energy in first half, but the mood changed after keira walsh s knee injury, she was carried off on a stretcher and in tears. you could feel the dynamics change a little bit, there were so many chances that england could have scored, they haven t, they are still ahead 1 0, but another goal could really settle the nerves at this point, especially because denmark have been pressing really hard in the second half. so all the england fans hoping for a second goal, because england and denmark are both fighting it out for that push for the knockout stages, either england or denmark will be in the final 16 if they win and if china fails to win against haiti, and that is looking ahead at the next game. for now, england feel that they need to hang on, i do score another goal or be stronger defensively, so that denmark do not
donald trump s favor, the justice department can appeal those decisions pretrial, but it s going to result in lengthy delays, which is something the justice department doesn t want and absolutely will be donald trump s bottom line game plan. neil, can we talk about something that barba just mentioned, the prosecutorial defense claim, right before this indictment was released, the trump defensively was talking a lot about comments made by investigator jay brought to the lawyer for walt nauta, robert goodman. can you talk about what you ve heard in terms of that claim, and whether it s something for the doj to be worried about? whether it s something that judge cannon can viably give credence to? yeah. every bad criminal defendant tries to make that kind of arguments about prosecutorial misconduct. it s going nowhere, it s going nowhere fast. in order to show prosecutorial misconduct like this, you d have to show some sort of actual malice on the part of the prosecutor, which just
basis of prosecutorial misconduct. so i think there will be lots of motions, and most of them will lack merit but if judge campbell should rule in donald trump s favor, the justice department can appeal those decisions pretrial, but it s going to result in lengthy delays, which is something the justice department doesn t want and absolutely will beat donald trump s bottom line game plan. when can we talk about something that i just mentioned? the prosecutorial right before this indictment was released, the trump defensively was talking a lot about comments made by to the lawyer for e can you talk about what you ve heard in terms of that claim, and whether it s something for the doj to be worried about? whether it s something that judge cannon can viably give credence? to win yeah. every bad criminal defendant tries to make that kind of arguments about prosecutorial misconduct. it s going, nowhere it s going