it was a defense thing. we have to have the equivalent of a modern i.p. network. you can t have every individual neighborhood and every individual company say i m going to maintain this one mile of road. no, we have governments to do that. so at some point i don t like the government involved in everything but internet infrastructure is a big play and ought to be in the middle of it. they re probably talking about that. morgan an charlie, monitoring the developments at the white house where the president is discussing this no doubt. we ll focus on that and also masking up that s going on around the country and apparently a sign by no less the president of the united states that it might be a good idea. the read from dr. francis collins here and only here next. e for members like martin. an air force veteran made of doing what s right, not what s easy.
clearly he had the details. he knew, looks like he is the guy. we don t know. this is one of those things. there are false confessions. numerous studies where people confess falsely when they are in custody. that s why miranda rights ski want to go t to the body. we don t know all the details and we don t know what led them there. what we are saying is he could have and i imagine that will be the defense theory, that it was a false confession. what they re trying to do is trying to eliminate the whole thing think it was involuntary. if it s involuntary, the statements don t come in at all. given the defense thing we want it thrown out and we think that confession was totally coerced. they said you should do the right thing, you have a young daughter, your daughters going to want to see you. this is the right thing, confess to it and it s all going to go away. wright, classic good cop-black cop. somebody must ve played bad cop during this thing. that s the kind of thing, why the
campaign law because it s a clear corporate contribution, no question about it. originally they had a plan that cohen was going to reimburse. but pecker said no, we re not going to reimburse. so you have those two building blocks. if you add something of value, that s just more and more building brolocks. i want to say one thing about this constant john edwards defense thing. in the john edwards case, the poor prosecutors didn t have any witnesses. they had cohen-like. a guy who lie and told different stories. the people who paid the money were dead or too sick to come. that s why the ami thing is so important. because now there s live witnesses to back up cohen s statement. it is important. they ve been allies for years. when pecker doesn t stand up for
are back at the capitol. that measure we re told will punt on this defense thing until they with regroup in a couple weeks before christmas. what do you think? that s a continuing resolution. two more weeks to keep the government going. we ve been operating in a defense department and across the government at large for 11 years, an absurdity. when you have a continuing resolution, there s no new starts. you can only executed what you re doing. you can t execute multiyear contracts. it hobbles the military in terms of its effectiveness and efficiency. we wind up spending more money as a result. it s one of the stupidest things we do and we ve done it for 11 years. neil: yeah. it s we ve almost gotten used to it. do you fear in the interim people look at this and say, well, we have to do this for
thing at the end of the show but the idea of being the free world has been our pride, we re the world s democracy, free elections, self-determination, the values of the west which we ve been able to extend through africa and latin america. a lot of countries in the world look to us as a model, and security is at the heart of that. also, the russians never liked nato because it works, because it worked. it kept germany in our hands and eventually got germany entirely in our hands, brought the baltic states in. i don t think we re ever headed for ukraine but i don t know, they don t like nato. they don t like nato. somebody said to me the corks were popping in moscow when president trump refused to reiterate his commitment to article five. why did that matter? well, because of course of trump s own rhetoric during the campaign. and it was trump who called into question our commitment to this thing which by the way, the united states is legally obligated to this treaty which we have. pr