until then, i ll send it back to you, guys, from the bottom of the world. all right. the top of the hour on cnn newsroom, good afternoon, everyone, i m bianna golodryga. i m victor blackwell. we re beginning with another dangerous close call involving a commercial airliner on a u.s. runway. the faa is now investigating. so here s what happened, monday night in boston logan airport, a jetblue flight and a private jet reportedly came within 565 feet of colliding. just a weeking in burbank, california, a mesa airlines had to abort its landing because a southwest flight was on the same runway. there was a close call between a fedex carg honolulu. days before that, aiines flightt of a delta flight at jfk in new york. this is all taking place as president biden s nominee to lead the faa sits down for his confirmation hearing and it hasn t exactly been smooth sailing for him. cnn aviation correspondent pete muntean joins us now. pete, if confirmed, he clearly has a lot on hi
Enforcement agencies all over Fulton County to then make sure that these grand jurors are safe. So i think one consideration the court also needs to make in allowing this is the safety of these grand jurors and their concerns that have already been voiced. But ill just say the Georgia Supreme Court observed the grand jury as a Public Institution serving the community might suffer if those testifying today knew that the secrecy of their testimony would be lifted tomorrow. The indispensable secrecy must not be broken except where theres a compelling necessity. Theres been no compelling necessity raised by this defense to pierce this veil of secrecy of the grand jury. What was the cite for that, the last one . Sorry, judge. Where is that coming from . Kessler, judge. Can you spell that one for me . You have that case, judge. In my stack. Can we just pause one moment . Sure. And then the state talked about this, but i wanted to point out, talking about deliberations and the fact it should
pieces together. and that s the situation that was arriving in june of 2021. when he was at the scene, with the victims. minutes before they died and lied to everyone who would listen. reporter: now, the state actually opened their opening statements back when the trial began, acknowledging that the majority of their case is circumstantial evidence. so he just spent quite a bit of time at the beginning of his closing arguments talking about what reasonable doubt actually means. something i actually expect the defense talk about quite a bit in their closing arguments. now, the beginning of the day, the jury actually took a trim out to the crime scene to moselle. there was media allowed when they were there. although both defense attorneys and prosecutors were there, as well as judge newman. the jurors were not allowed to speak to anybody. but according to the media pool
eastern part. what are your contacts asking for in terms of what do they need? what do the people of ukraine need right now? well, we re in a constant dialogue with ukraine about what it needs both on the humanitarian side and what it needs on the military side. our military commanders talked to ukraine s military commanders constantly. our secretaries of defense talk, our national security advisers talk practically daily and our presidents talk frequently. and it s a discussion about what ukraine needs. we try our very best to provide it ourselves. if we can t provide it, we ask our allies and partners to help provide it. we facilitate our allies and partner to provide it, if necessary. then we get it to ukraine as quickly as possible. unfortunately logistics are not always easy. it has to come a long way. some of these things are very heavy and complex but we re
have a copy. you don t have to write it down. you ll have a copy back there with you. let s get started. this case is really about assumptions and driveway decisions. you heard the defense talk about probable cause. you re going to have to distinguish between assumptions based on goss up and rumor, and all of this neighborhood talk on facebook, and actual probable cause to believe a crime had been committed and someone had committed that crime. the state s position is, all three of these defendants make assumptions. made assumptions about what was going on that day and they made their decision to attack ahmaud arbery in their driveways, because he was a black man running down the street. so here s what we ve got. bottom line, they assumed they must have committed some kroo imthat day, because he s running fast down the street, right?