or from the horse s mouth himself. he can only get it from there and we re waiting to see if he ll do it. congressman, what do you think mueller is more like to do if he has some sort of gomt potential obstruction of justice by president trump? well, i ll tell you. they will prepare immensely for this particular interview which is why it is so risky for trump to walk into that terview. th ll know more about what he did a said and all the people cooperating withhe investigation will help guide the questioning for that particular interview. and so i m sure that they ll want to get to the heart of was it deliberately intentionally trying to get the investigation to go away? or was it within the duties of the president? i think from a defense position, that s a pretty high bar. you ll have to get over it. you ll to have get over the bar that he wasn t acting on the
i would like to base our decisions on how to restrict visas based upon actual intelligence rather than broader generalizations, but this is better than where he was were before. he took a step from where he was to a position that s workable to protect the country. he was ill-served by whoever it was that cam up with the way to roll this out, not including irrelevant people that needs to be included like general kelly and others, not getting all the briefings from the airports, all the security folks to ensure things were not done inkrengtly, which obviously were, and then trying to defend it as if what you see is not what you really see. what it allowed the president s adversaries today was to call it a muslim ban, which it is not. it took the president further back than it needed to. tonight, frankly, the president was ill-served, took a reasonable defense position than he had taken in the campaign, and it s one that s in the right
which obviously were, and then trying to defend it as if what you see is not what you really see. what it allowed the president s adversaries today was to call it a muslim ban, which it is not. it took the president further back than it needed to. tonight, frankly, the president was ill-served, took a reasonable defense position than he had taken in the campaign, and it s one that s in the right direction in terms of defending our country, and i think he was extraordinarily ill-served by the way it was presented. stop grading on the curve. most botched foreign policy. general mattis carved out interpreters in combat with american soldiers so they don t die when their planes you want a person who comes to the republican field, you came with a lot of foreign policy, knowledge, experience, and depth of understanding. how could that happen? well, listen, you know this
iran, north korea, we never heard about those in a public forum in 2008 or 2009, but now it s generally accepted that these nation states are targeting the united states. to see that come out was important, i think. but nothing new. let s talk about the actual hack in the first place. you know a lot about it, i know. you were partly involved in helping when the attack happened. what made it difference from previous efforts? i think what we have seen is the movement from typical espionage to the use of cyber as a vector, where intelligence services are taking intelligence to collect to behalf of their governments, looking for strategic analysis and opportunities to determine what the united states may or may not do from an economy position, from a defense position, et cetera. in this particular case, what we saw was the operationalizing of
i ve been stabbed and i remember who stabbed me. it wasn t dr. ben carson, was it? no, no. forget all this other stuff. on issues, he can t explain his tax position. he can t explain his middle eastern position. he can t explain his defense position and now he s taken some of the world s great monumets like the pyramids and turn them into grain bins. didn t that the prove the point, which is, shouldn t journalists, what ben carson would say is that journalists should be focusing on those things of substance and do away with his personal childhood stories that may have discrepancies. if there s enough discrepancies, no, the answer to that is no. the cnbc, those people sat around and must have had a bad night or they got in trouble with husbands and wives. that was ridiculous. fox people will come out and ask serious policy questions. they re not going to do any gotcha stuff so republicans can t pull that off again or at