people off to the insurrection or lied and defamed people in ways that damaged them or their companies. now, the people who have sued aren t always fox haters or critics, the voting company that got over half a billion dollars out of them didn t have longstanding grievances with the company. they were just able to get so far in their punishing lawsuit that they got over half a b out of rupert murdoch and tucker carlson was fired. i say that before i bring in james carville because this comes from a trump supporter, ray epps. he says that tucker carlson, the former fox host, ousted after a different lawsuit, was at an illegal or defamatory level, peddling knowingly false conspiracy theories, specifically against him. he says, quote, carlson was telling a fantastical story in which epps was some sort of undercover fbi agent responsible for the actual mob that broke into the capital. so what you re about to see is what we warned you before, not offered as true, not offered as
whether it s the times, new yorker, or fox. seems the pressure that s increasing on fox, as an organ of right wing information, an arbiter of the republican party, this is also a political story i m curious what you think. well, it is, and i m associated with media that s done a if you remember right after january 6th, they needed an alternative story, and said it was really antifa. but there s no such thing at antifa, so you can t defame it. there s no organization, there s no antifa headquarters, there s no antifa board. so if they would have just stuck with antifa, they would have probably been okay. but then they single mr. epps out. of course it s a file, it s a lawsuit. the defense hadn t had a chance, but all of it seems pretty true. the stuff him saying about mr. epps that people in
everybody in the world so we can raise the standard of living for women and girls and have a higher quality of life for everyone, but we cannot mess around. there isn t going to be a new tipping point. things are getting worse and worse and worse. let s go. are you going to run for president? disclosure, i m not running for president. at least not right now. you re almost hedging with the list. you make such important points, you make them clearly. we will, to your charge, stay on this issue. last week, hottest every. you talked about people get involved, vote, it s not my job to tell people what to do, but we can have that fact handy. that raises the question, of, do we want to do anything about that fact? bill, thank you, sir. thank you. next up, i have been previewing it. now we turn to it. the trump warning from bob woodward that you need to hear next. ing from bob woodward that you need to hear next g enamel- nothing beats it.
gonna cover it. that is what i think it could ve been. who? who knows. nobody knows. prosecution does not know. i do not know. but it has some significance don t you think? you certainly could portray it as being significant. you could also portray it as it being lower to popularize. remember how the prosecution argued that vashti suicide note found in the journal was a forgery? possibly committed by brett? the defense hadn t and writing expert of its own. that concluded that vashti did in fact write the note. and brett asking for the overnight projector at work, hours before vastly died? the attorney who cross-examined the coworker, the one who helped him find it. mr. seacat was not secretive when he asked you this question? no. not at all. he goes and ask someone to help him find an overhead projector? he asked people to take him up to where it is, he carries it
surprise. then they find the blindfold. how do you deliver a surprise inyou put the blindfold on and say, hey, honey, i have a surprise for you, boom. she did admit to pushing him in the back with both hands, which cuts against the argument of mistake. i didn t even think the prosecution needed the blindfold. the judge wasn t inclined to let it in because there wasn t a connect. i think this case was always about who does that? that s how juries look at these cases. i tried enough cases to know when juries go back in the juryroom, they use their common sense and say, wow, what newly wed would behave this way after pushing her husband? she admitted to pushing her husband. the only question was whether or not she intended to do it or whether or not it was an accident. let me ask you this, how does this even work? the prosecutor had plained their side of things. the defense hadn t done that. they were going to say this was a frightened young woman, she