ho did not respond to a request for an interview. however, in court he told the jury phyllis barnes needed sinus surgery. not only was she a candidate but after that surgery she never again complained about her sinuses. vanity fair writer buzz bissinger says that defense fits in perfectly with what he s learned about mark weinberger. i believe he thinks all of the surgery he did was necessary. weinberger s lawyer had witnesses that said phyllis barnes cancer was probably not even detectible when she first visited dr. weinberger. in fact, other professionals such as the emergency room doctors who had seen phyllis barnes at the same time had failed to detect her throat cancer. i would ask people just to look at it for more than just one side. interestingly, suzette dennington, perhaps mark
played for the court, weinberger s attorney began his defense by admitting mark weinberger is probably not a likeable guy. but that he told the jury is beside the point. this case, he says, is about one thing and one thing only. dr. weinberger s treatment of phyllis barnes. james ho was the attorney hired by weinberger s malpractice insurer to defend him. ho did not respond to a request for an interview. however, in court he told the jury phyllis barnes needed sinus surgery. not only was she a candidate but after that surgery she never again complained about her sinuses. vanity fair writer buzz bissinger says that defense fits in perfectly with what he s learned about mark weinberger. i believe he thinks all of the surgery he did was necessary. weinberger s lawyer had witnesses that said phyllis
jury phyllis barnes needed sinus surgery. not only was she a candidate but after that surgery she never again complained about her sinuses. vanity fair writer buzz bissinger says that defense fits in perfectly with what he s learned about mark weinberger. i believe he thinks all of the surgery he did was necessary. weinberger s lawyer had witnesses that said phyllis barnes cancer was probably not even detectible when she first visited dr. weinberger. in fact, other professionals such as the emergency room doctors who had seen phyllis barnes at the same time had failed to detect her throat cancer. i would ask people just to look at it for more than just one side.
surgery. not only was she a candidate but after that surgery she never again complained about her sinuses. vanity fair writer buzz bissinger says that defense fits in perfectly with what he s learned about mark weinberger. i believe he thinks all of the surgery he did was necessary. weinberger s lawyer had witnesses that said phyllis barnes cancer was probably not even detectible when she first visited dr. weinberger. in fact, other professionals such as the emergency room doctors who had seen phyllis barnes at the same time had failed to detect her throat cancer. i would ask people just to look at it for more than just one side. interestingly, suzette dennington, perhaps mark weinberger s most passionate defender, was not called to testify.
the running back and north by devon nunez is also part of the obstruction scheme. he, too, could be prosecuted. what we have here is a white house that is orchestrating a massive coverup, more serious than that of richard nixon. and covering something that goes to the national security of the united states. an attack by a hostile, foreign power on our democracy, on our power grid and the administration is doing into abo nothing about it. so this is the most serious possible kind of obstruction of justice. the is still need to be dotted, the ts still need to be crossed. but i very much agree with bill s notion that this is something that only an o.j. simpson defense fits. i may be a criminal, but the