is the important development for terminating the sanction, and imposing resolutions against iran. we consider unfair the conduct of the security council in the past, and we insist that iran, due to the important fatwa of the leader, and the defense doctrine has never had the intention of producing a nuclear weapon, and therefore the sanctions against iran are unjust and therefore illegal. the sanctions by the security council, and unilateral sanctions were made because of elusive information, and these sanctions in in any way never affected the policy that we approached and the approach that we took toward negotiation. s.
includes social security, medicare, medicaid, and more, is projected to raise $85 billion or 4% to $2.1 trillion this year. interest on the debt is worse. projected to increase 14% per year, almost quadrupling in dollar terms between 2014 and 2024. we re going to be spending more in interest in a couple years than we do on our national defense. the obama administration acknowledges the cuts are controversial but are done with a specific intention. in order to sustain our readiness and technological superiority and special operations forces and cyb cyber resources. democrats also maintain the military needs to be smaller with a drawdown from two wars. we do not need, i don t think, for the defense of our country to be able to have a defense doctrine that is cause for fighting two land wars at the same time. the price is going to be paid for this. whether it s in the middle east, whether it s in the pacific, whether it s in europe.
very bad deal for the region and for the world. and you know, when you have the arabs and israelis speaking in one voice, it doesn t happen very often. i think it s worth paying attention to us. a statement like that is not only to the world, but also to the domestic internal politics of the u.s. what do you make of that statement? well, you know, netanyahu is the first prime minister, maybe in israeli history, certainly since 1973, that has had to depart from israel s defense doctrine of going it alone. he really needs the united states in this. because israel would be very difficult for israel to stop iran s nuclear weapons program, should it come to that, by itself. but what his problem is, he has a dysfunctional relationship with president obama. if there was another president, if there was a president john mccain, somebody with whom he has a report, he might be able to go forward and trust the americans, but their relationship is, i think, what s obstructing a lot of what s ha
place in our defense doctrine. nor nuclear energy, nuclear technology, nuclear uses sure. reporter: you would not suspend before an answer is given? this is not a decision that could be easily forgotten tomorrow we ll just suspend all activities. reporter: the suspension of enrichment is key demand of the west. he rebuffed that and would not commit on a whole host of other questions, arthel. arthel: this question, threat of israeli attack, did he have something to say about that? reporter: yeah, a, absolutely with israeli prime minister netanyahu a preemptive strike against various installations in iran could be a real possibility we put it to him. we asked him what would be the response, what would be the reaction? take a listen what he said to this. what if israel were to attack? what would be the response? what would be the response of iran? would you attack israel? of course, my offices have already said nobody
jenna: we have a special fox exclusive for you now as pressure grows on iran to give up its nuclear program. one of its top diplomats says iran has nothing to hide. but when it comes to free and open inspections by the united nations, well, that s a little bit of a different story. greg talcott has the inside scoop, he s live in london. greg? reporter: hey, jenna. the man s iran s ambassador to the iaea, the u.n. s nuclear watchdog agency based in vienna. we pressed him on the nuclear program, crucially, we asked him is iran building a nuclear weapon or would it like to? here s a little bit of what he said. nuclear iran has no place in our defense doctrine. for nuclear energy and technology, for peaceful uses, sure.