relates to ongoing cases and potentially other cases, as well. the judge goes with that. here s the defense lawyer. your honor, the government s theory is that the documents and items possessed by my client before they were seized by the government somehow become confidential once they re seized by the government. when the government gives them back they can protect them under a protective order. the judge jumps in, mr. drus col, if material that was seized that was in the possession of the defendant concerns material, for example, on her computer that the government is using in connection with an ongoing investigation, well, merely because it was in the possession of your client doesn t mean that it doesn t need to be because there are ongoing investigations. the fact it was in your client s possession doesn t give it some kind of tas is manic position. i m not understanding your position. defense lawyer. it s my position it s the government s burden to say what