After the article was published, Murdoch sent the publishers of Crikey a ‘concerns notice’, essentially threatening to sue them. In response, the publishers almost dared Murdoch to sue.
seize in charlottesville, it i all very important ways that w can use defamation laws, libel laws, infliction of emotiona distress laws, civil right laws, to drive up the cost o not speech, its lies as you know, lives have neve had any protection in th constitution, in fact they r anathema to the firs amendment. so, i think what we saw on the dominion case is that new york times versus sullivan an defamation law continues to be a vital tool in combatting thi rising threat of disinformatio that you talk so powerfull about. either one of these cases whether it s the guns of the lies, is there something - we don t have federa legislation that protects us all in this front, is ther something that a democrati governor could do to say, this stops here sure, in connecticut we v been very fortunate to hav leadership on this issue we ve seen stores laws i connecticut s, their laws unde contemplation right now that - limit bulk purchases and
can use defamation laws, libel laws, infliction of emotiona distress laws, civil right laws, to drive up the cost o not speech, its lies as you know, lives have neve had any protection in th constitution, in fact they r anathema to the firs amendment. so, i think what we saw on the dominion case is that new york times versus sullivan an defamation law continues to be a vital tool in combatting thi rising threat of disinformatio that you talk so powerfull about. either one of these cases whether it s the guns of the lies, is there something - we don t have federa legislation that protects us all in this front, is ther something that a democrati governor could do to say, this stops here sure, in connecticut we v been very fortunate to hav leadership on this issue we ve seen stores laws i connecticut s, their laws unde contemplation right now that - limit bulk purchases and
It’s far easier to throw around accusations of damage to one’s reputation than it is to actually prove it in court. A journalism scholar explains the criteria that must be met.
It’s far easier to throw around accusations of damage to one’s reputation than it is to actually prove it in court. A journalism scholar explains the criteria that must be met.