suits like yours? it is not their story. it does not. in fact, the way defamation law works, if you repeat something that is defamatory, you now own that statement. by publishing that i have to point out, they were the first one to publish it, clearly, these documents were in theo possession of various news organizations for weeks. yet, no one published it. this is one of those rare situations where msnbc, cnn, and fox, all agree on something, and they agree that this document should not have been published. it was irresponsible. tucker: the details, i think cnn went with an overview but they didn t go with the details. what is interesting, i think this is come to your attention. buzzfeed, as i said, publish to this with the idea that the public needed to know. but they have done nobu substantial follow-up pieces. there hasn t, apparently that i have seen, but in an effort to report this out. they haven t continue to dig up facts on this dossier. by do you think that is? i don
in fact, the way defamation law works, if you repeat something that is defamatory, you now own that statement. by publishing match i have to point out, they were the first one to publish it, clearly, these documents were in the possession of various news organizations for weeks. yet, no one published it. this is one of those rare situations where msnbc, cnn, and fox, all agree on something, and they agree that this document should not have been published. it was irresponsible. tucker: the details, i think cnn went with an overview but they didn t go with the details. what is interesting, i think this is come to your attention. buzzfeed, as i said, publish to this with the idea that the public needed to know. but they have done no substantial follow-up pieces. there hasn t come apparently that i have seen, but in an effort to report this out. they have and continue to dig up facts on this dossier. by do you think that is? i don t think that they did