fentanyl from mexico. he probably does yoga and is riding his bicycle. peter does not seem like a criminal, much less a danger to this nation. and yet last friday federal agents arrested peter navarro a reagan national airport in washington. they did not call his lawyer as is customary in cases like this. they didn t even come to his house. it was feet from the fbi building. they could have walked, but the didn t. instead they took him down in public as you would a fugitive terror mastermind so everyone could see it and learn the lessons they were sending. they handcuffed peter navarro and put him in leg irons and threw him into a cell. he is now facing years in prison . so what did peter navarro do to deserve treatment like this? he resisted a subpoena from the january 6th committee. the january 6th committee is washington s latest inquisition run by nancy pelosi with help from liz cheney and adam kinzinger. navarro resisted that subpoena because he had nothing to do with ja
sentinel, for example, from mexico. in fact, his hobby is yoga and riding his bicycle. in short, peter navarro doeses not seem like a criminal, much less a danger to this nation. and yet last friday, federalde agents arrested peter navarro at reagan nationalraed airport in washington. they did not calll. his lawyer as is customary in cases like this , they didn t even comeev o his house, which as it happens is just feet from the fbi building. they could have walked but they didn t. instead , they took down peter navarro in public as you would a fugitive terrors mastermind so everyone could see it and learn the lessonuf they were sending. they handcuffed peter navarro. they put him in leg ironsfed pua and then they threw him in a cell. he s now facing years in prison . what did peter navarro do too deserve treatment like this ?o well, he resisted a subpoena from the january 6th committee. the january 6th committee is washington s latest partisan inquisition6t run by nancy pelo
well, we re going to be taking court. go ahead. tell us the legal action. okay, sure. to answer your first question with regard to what we plan toti do with the tech companies, of course we re looking at those and i think the first one that i m taking look at is facebook. mark zuckerberg announced in a videotape that what kyle waswa involved in was a mass murderwa and that s clearly defamatory as well. that s not protected by section 230 communications decency act in my opinion. section two allows you. to take down, you know, violent things or, you know, things that people don t want to hear.b but telling the truth about kyle is not something section two thirty enables facebook to take down. so that s an. example of what we plan to do with tech and also plan to do in the i defamation arena. at and by defamation, do you mean with so-called news organizations? absolutely. that on the way in andd certainly kyle was charged
we are going to be taking them to court. go ahead. telis the legal action. sure. to answer your first question with regard with what we plan t do, we are looking at those. the first one i am looking at i facebook. mark zuckerberg announced in a video what kyle was involved in was a mass murderer and that is clearly defamatory as well. that is not protected by sectio 230 in the decency act. in my opinion section 230 allow you to take down violent things or things that people don t wan to hear by telling the truth about kyle which is not something that section 230 enabled facebook to take down. that s an example of what we plan to do with tech and plan t do in the defamation arena. 2 by defamation arena, you mean so-called news organizations? absolutely. you mentioned some of that on the way in.