it and i guess if you could p put if you could put the sort of bookends at, you know, basically a trade war that nobody is for, except him and the other protectionists in his inner circle, you got paul ryan, who never complained about devin nunes or the russia investigation or any of the president s ethical lapses, you know, all, you know, def con 4 over trade. sure. and you got everything that s the highest-level problem they have in policy. you ve got north korea which is exactly as you described. a skill the obama administration or the clinton administration or the bush administration would have a system for dealing with a north korea that the south says it s ready to engage in talks about their nukes. there are no systems. there s just a president on twitter. it s not a real white house. there s none. i think it was on your show, if not wuone of your colleagues la week, said there s never been anybody more unprepared to be president of the united states. that s what we re
in this administration. as a result of a lot of factors, i d say we ve never seen a republican majority on capitol hill less free pair prepared to the shadow of donald trump either. that s a key point. we can t do anything. you mentioned daca quite correctly. there s a congress that could legislate about this. trad trade. 232 of the trade act. congress passed. congress can revise this, congress can say no. why don t they do anything. they d have to have the appetite to wrestle back control. they are the people who can do it. we should be a little more indignant, in my opinion. i am very if you re at def con 4, you re speaker of the house. only about trade. do something. he s worried about midterms. donald trump wrestled control of this party. he owns it. there s no greater political force in the republican party than drup druonald trump. and paul ryan and mitch mcconnell cannot beat that back. the president remains more popular in republican district. they have