it is good to be back with you, thanks for staying up late with us, i will see you all at the end of tomorrow. row. tonight on all in, the opinion was wrong, and i think the government should appeal it. the special master ruling on the ex president s stash of classified documents. tonight, the trump judge who gave him what he wanted. what it all means for the investigation and the rule of law? then tim wanted to take part in what he thought was going to be a historical event. the insurrectionist and alleged nazi sympathizer who became the latest marga murder for january six. plus, one of trump s fake electors caught on tape as she escorts data breachers into a county office in georgia.
in their equipment, it is wild. we have been following this. there has been reporting for the washington post, someone from a civil lawsuit, about this forensic firm retained by sidney powell and other trump lawyers that can t access in several places around the country to this vote and data. in this case, it appears with the help and cooperation of this official, this local county chair. the county is a very republican county that went to trump in huge amounts. my other question for you is the jurisdiction question. we have an ongoing investigation into the fake electors impossible criminal attempts to subvert or overturn the election coming out of fulton county, benny willis. what are the boundaries of her jurisdiction as she looked into the case? she does not have jurisdiction in coffee county, but the facts that are coming to light. again these are not to be facts that he s able to present to a special attorney, or she would
trump got lucky this time, he got cannon. he won t judge shopping, again, this time, the doj case landed before aileen cannon. efforts, she prepared skeptical, requesting more information from trump s lawyer as to why the case was even come before her and to begin with. there is a pending legal matter under another judge, former magistrate judge, reinhart, right? that is the name you recognize already overseeing it. he s hearing about which part of the search warrant will be made public and which part of the affidavit will be made public. he is overseeing it, right? so cannon ask, why me? but she seems to have gotten the picture pretty quickly, last week, she took the unprecedented step to basically tell everyone at a time that you are role in trump s favor before issuing a ruling it s up yesterday, as you noted a moment ago, is basically the laughing stock of the entire legal profession. canon ruled that the department of justice must pause review of the documents seized from trump s
united states would love to get, which is in joining a criminal investigation. this is an important point. it is not just that she ordered a special master. sometimes those happen. we have situations where, for instance, a lawyer s searched, and you have to make sure that some of those documents are protected, the privilege claims to not get mixed in. she was a step further to the point like, i did not even know a judge could do this. that s one of the reasons that people are reacting to this. every single defendant is gonna look at this and say, give me what he has. who wants to have a criminal investigation of himself or herself? you are going to asked to have the same thing. what she did here is that she said there is a tiny kernels of maybe attorney-client information. it s not even clear that the party has agreed that there is some sort of dispute. she took
bar. we saw with michael flynn, with roger stone, this is another example of creating a rule that comes out and says it, which is that he is getting something that every single person, who is under investigation in the united states would love to get, which is in joining a criminal investigation. this is an important point. it is not just that she ordered a special master. sometimes, those have been. we have situations where, for instance, a lawyer s searched, and you have to make sure that some of those documents are protected the privilege claims to not get mixed in. she was a step further to the point like, i did not even know a judge who do this. that s one of the reasons that people are reacting to this. every single defendant is gonna look at this and say, give me what he has. who wants to have a criminal investigation of himself or herself? you are asked to have the same thing. what she did here is that she said there is a tiny kernels of