Landfall, and Economic Relief negotiations. This is a portion of her briefing. You can watch the full press conference on cspan. Org. Good morning, everyone. Its a sad time for it so much going on. In my state of california, we have wildfires being described as armageddon. On the gulf coast, we have a hurricane coming in. It has been described yesterday as being unsurvivable. We have a pandemic continues to threaten the lives of the American People. Then, we have sadness of kenosha, wisconsin. Of jacob blake being shot seven times. There are Public Policies it couldve made a difference in all of this. Let me say three words about the wildfires hurricanes and the coronavirus. Three words. Science, science, science. The science of the administration has chosen to ignore and the Republican Party for a long time for the trumpet administration has ignored. The Trump Administration has ignored it. The Climate Crisis is not only having a physical impact, but Economic Impact in a way that is a
She also learned the law. She learned to use the law library, and she tried to be her own person in prison, and theres this wonderful anecdote which i think Ken Armstrong captured for the marshall report that said she wouldnt eat in the cafeteria. She wanted her food to be brought to her because she thought eating in the cafeteria were like pigs in a trough so she demanded her food be brought to her and she had a very specific diet because again, she very much wanted to be her own person. She had aer is the tud about her. That is how she left prison. She returned to queens and she was involved in an Organization Called the volunteer Attorney Service team where they provided legal advice to inmates. She had a number of business ventures, real estate. She was a seamstress so she was engaged a little bit in that trade and she was always looking for ways to improve herself. She left prison the same way she entered prison and the same way she acted the way, as you see in the clip, i live my
Decisions. Number 759, bernies miranda, Petitioner Versus arizona. Number 218, roe v. Wade. The most famous decisions are once that the court took were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of 310 million different people, who helped stick together because they believe in the rule of law. Good evening. Welcome to cspan in the National Constitution centers landmark cases. Our 12 part series looks at some of the Supreme Courts most interesting and impactful historical decisions over the course of our countrys history. We are going to be talking about a case you might not know much about, but by the and you understand why it is on our last. Its called the slaughterhouse cases, it was the first time that the Supreme Court reviewed the newly enacted 14th amendment to the constitution. Let me introduce you to our two guests, here to tell you about the history and importance of these cases. Paul clement s
Popular states just hours out from a shutdown aimed at halting a covert outbreak. And devastation in southern japan dozens are killed as heavy rain and mudslides submerged roads and buildings. Welcome to the program the United Kingdom has set its sights on those behind the bird a saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi its unveiled its 1st unilateral sanctions and sleeving the European Union 49. 00 individuals and organizations are being targeted under a new system to punish human rights the fed theres a song youre going to reports. A long awaited action against abuses of human rights the measures announced by the foreign secretary committed the u. K. To holding perpetrators of mistreatment to account this government and this house sends a very clear message on behalf of the british people. That those with blood on their hands are thugs of despots the henchmen of dictators will not be free to waltz into this country to buy property on the kings or a kings road to do their Christmas Shopping i
Versus arizona. Number 18, roe versus wade. Quite often in many of our most famous decisions are ones that the court took that were unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of 310 million different people who helped stick together because they believe in a rule of law. Good evening and welcome to cspans landmark cases where weve been learning more about historic cases at the Supreme Court that have affected the court and affected the country. Tonight the 1961 case of mapp v. Ohio, involving dollree mapp. An ohio woman that refused to let the Police Search her house without a warrant a case that involves some back stairs intrigue at the security itself and all this evolved into a case that was one of a series in the warren courts that changed policing in america. We welcome with us this program and hope you have been with us throughout the series as weve been learning so much about the Supreme Court. Let me