really follow through with congressional delegation. and justice kagan in her dissent said you have essentially made the court the decisionmaker here. you have you re taking powers, you majority, and misreading the statute and contracting regulatory authority and the authority that congress wanted to give to the secretary of education. core core debates played out in terms of what the country is all about and what the powers of government are all about. so interesting. and laura and kerry, i want to read a bit more of what we heard and actually read in the decision and the opinion and the dissent. first let s start about justice sotomayor, more of her dissenting opinion. the decision threatens to vulcannize the market and allow the exclusion of other groups from services. a web designer could refuse to create a wedding websites for an interracial couple, what you were referring to, joan, and
leadership. keep in mind, this is a man who has been a decisionmaker along with putin, alongside him. so what does it say about putin s standing if someone with such a high rank might ve been complicit in the insurrection against him. it also raises the question as to whether there are more people inside putin s military who have aligned themselves with prigozhin. a european intelligence official tells cnn tonight the top russian security officials may have known about prigozhin s plot before it happened, and may have wanted to see how it played out. these are stunning developments and they do suggest that there may be more than just cracks when it comes to putin s hold on power. which may explain this rare surprise appearance by the russian president. today putin traveling to the region of dagastan in southern russia. people cheering him on saying he did not doubt the support of russians during the insurrection. of course, they re putting this video out.
he ll live long because putin can t afford having to put in such an awkward situation. it s, again, humiliation all over the face. dictator can t afford to look weak. and putin lost control. and he even talked about recognizing that his mafia state was on the verge of collapse. yeah. good point. how seriously do you think, gary, this unprecedented chaos right now undermines putin s grip on power? again, he lost prestige. dictator relies on his ability, and he s always the last decisionmaker. everything he says is the law. and it seemed that whatever he said in the last 56 hours didn t work out. it s not him, it s lukashenko who negotiated the deal. that s what they told us. we know that he even talked to the president, he was turned
own credibility has been undermined by things they ve done in the past. and eileen cannon was overruled in a series of strong pro-trump rulings when he went in to challenge the search warrant in his home. and she was overruled by the 11th circuit court of appeals. so there s at least the suggestion that she should think about it. i don t know what all of the procedures are within the court for dealing with that. but i think whoever is the ultimate decisionmaker would have to consider what her track record is. how much influence will she have over the course of this trial? well, a district court judge, the trial judge has tremendous influence over everything. from the timing of motions to the timing of the trial to ruling on different kinds of suppression motions related to the evidence in the case. so the trial judge is an
that meeting and what took place. can i do the first part the second part gets trickier. good morning. and, look, thanks for having me on why came can as we this investigation. no reason on god s green s earth that anyone should trust the information bubbling up from the special counsel s office to the attorney general. under the special counsel statute, it s still the attorney general that controls the ultimate decisions here. it s not jack smith, well, what we have run into through the course of trying to have meetings is an attorney general that s hiding behind jack smith, pretending that he is not the ultimate decisionmaker and what we want told do is say, look, we have uncovered significant misconduct. substantive defenses that are fantastic. mark levin could rattle them off better than me. the presidential records act means this entire thing is not in a criminal setting. that s a statutory scheme about document retention and relinquishing to archives that has no criminal penalt