decision making processes, executive departments and agencies must recognize and work to address inequities and their policies and programs. that s a mouthful. but ignore the noble language because when they use the term racial equity it s really not about helping african-americans. it s another follows about equity. it s about helping advance the democrats agenda which essentially is 21st century socialism. the idea of equity would never include a scenario underwhich a government contract, for instance, would be awarded to a business headed by a conservative black man or a woman over one headed by a white, reliable supporter of the left, let s say, climate agenda. because unless you fully buy in to what they believe, you don t count as being traditionally from an underserved community. remember how justice thomas, my old boss, is treated by the
to embedding fairnesedrness ins, decision making processes, executive departments executnts and us t recognize to and work to redress inequities and their policies and programs policies a . that s a mouthful, but ignor pea becausble language, because when they use the term raciale racial equ equity, it s really not aboutt helping african-americans. it s als about o not about equity. it s about helping advance essentiallats agenda, which essentially is twenty first century socialis 21sm. their idea of equity would never never include a scenario underie which a government contract, for instance, woul awad be awark to a business headed by ar conservative black man or womana over one headed by a white, bl reliable supporter of the less lefse, let s say, climate agenda, because unless you wha fully buy intot what they believe, you don t count as being traditionally from a underserve community. old bo remember how justice tho, my oldss boss, is treated by the
significant threats to our air space puts us in a position of if you try and defend against everything, you defend against nothing. so i mean, the military and intel community are rapidly trying to assess this situation and provide the best advice, but unfortunately, we have too many people giving advice that don t know what these radars provide at norad, and what kind of decision making processes go on in both the department of defense and the white house to address these kind of threats. yeah, i m glad you raised that because it does seem as though there are plenty of normal flocks of birds in the sky. norad, for example, tracks santa claus around christmas time. we can t shoot down everything that we may be picking up. david, let s talk kind of big picture here because you obviously spent a lot of time thinking about our position in the world and how our policies are playing out day to day, and there has been this gradual deterioration of communications
about president putin s decision making now, the caliber of his decision making and also his grip on power in his own country? has any of that changed over the course of the year? i can t speak to the way mr. putin gets advised and how he, you know, who s advising him and what they re saying. i couldn t begin to get inside kremlin decision making processes. clearly mr. putin isn t making good decisions. shouldn t have invaded in the first place. this is a country that poses no threat to anybody, clearly not russia. he hasn t made sound decisions, with respect to their performance on the battlefield. they are still suffering some o. same problems they were a year ago, logistics, sustainment, integration of joint fires, manpower, personnel, unit cohesion. i could go on and on. the russian military is still struggling. they have not surmounted these problems. it s borne out by the fact he
what are the techniques the united states is using not only from the standpoint of military tracking the device, doing things like communicating about the device, they re listening in on those kind of things, which we do to other countries, they do to us, but also decision-making processes. not just in the military, wolf, but also in the government. you know, there will probably be reporting in the next several days about the number of demarshes issued by the united states against china, saying this is not something that s acceptable in the international community. i m sure that s happened more than once, knowing what goes on at em bassies. so you ve combined the kinds of actions. i think china wants to see how does the united states react to a balloon flying six a thousand feet above its territory across this that i go? they know we re going to reacts militarily to it one way or another. they also want to see, how does the government treat this?