maybe it s just as controversial and polarizing. it always pains me to be in agreement with my friend paul. however, he is absolutely correct, it is way too soon to be focusing on these polls in terms of the general election. i ve decided, i think, before december of 1979 poll that showed jimmy carter this was trumpeted by the carter white house, i might ad, that showed jimmy carter beating ronald reagan 60 to 36% with the pollster for president carter saying the data was just overwhelmingly in favor of carter and they can t wait to run against reagan. here we are, almost in december the year before next november, it is just way too soon to get into this. and by the time let s just say it is donald trump versus hillary clinton, then people are going to start to focus. they both have their negative,
kick butt attitude that donald trump exudes. you re not at all worried as a democrat or somebody that supports hillary clinton. you re not worried if he is in fact the nominee. you think matched against hillary clinton, what? i m just not. i don t want to jinx it. there is no chance that he is the nominee. but i m wearing my knees out praying that he will be. why 46? where do you see those numbers? look at mississippi and utah. some states are just not open to democrats. but no. this guy isn t going to be the president of the united states. go ahead. you know, i mentioned to you once, two things here. a poll from december of 1979 that showed jimmy carter beating ronald reagan 60 to 36%. listening to amanda describe her home area of michigan, we all remember the phrase, some of us do, reagan democrats.