about. another key text that i ve been talking about is on december 15, 2016, when strzok texts page, leaking like mad, scorned in political and worried they re kicking into overdrive. six days before that is when the cia started to assess that russia intervened on behalf of donald trump and of course that entire narrative somehow got spun into russia colluded with trump. sean, something else that has to be investigated, how was the mainstream media duped or complicit in utilizing all these texts to create this entire investigation. one of the questions we will be asking inspector general horowitz tomorrow is based on what the fbi knew very early in 2017, why did this investigation even continue? there is no way we should ve had a special counsel. the fbi knew way too much about unreliable the steele dossier was and the all they were gathering was exculpatory
a solid basis but even at that point in time, the office of general counsel of the fbi say not so fast. you need probable cause. all this timeline will be on our website after the hearing tomorrow, and you have to go through it in detail, and it s very revealing. sean: i want to know, they also, nobody really members this. they say something that i thought was interesting when they talk about the white house wants to be informed every step of the way. my understanding, andy mccarthy s understanding is you can t have a counterintelligence investigation without a president knowing. if that s true and they are saying the white house wants to know everything, what does barack obama know and when did he know it and who else in his circle knew about was going on idre? when our committee released those texts, everybody pooh-poohed it. that s what we are talking about. look at more evidence and more texts and the timeline. reyou realize no, that s probaby exactly what they were talking abo
this is an insuranceha policy. they have this information but what has happened to the trump administration. chuck todd cut you off when i started talking about the december 15, 2016 text from peter strzok and lisa page. mark: i m not going to cut you off. can i quote it? december 15, 2016 text from peter strzok to lisa page quote think their sisters the cia had begun leaking like mad, scorned and worried at politico they are kicking into overdrive. again this is duringit the transition a little bit more than a month after the election. six months before that is the first story that breaks in the ci a is attributed to it. mark: the boston globe washington the cia has concluded in6 a secret assessment that russia intervened in the 2016
not backfire. look at what happened to trump administration. chuck todd cut me off when i started talking about de decembr 15. i am not cut you on you of, december 15, 2016, text from peter strzok to lisa page. think our sisters, the cia, have begun leaking like mad, scored and wary, they are kicking to over drive. during the transition. a little bit after the election. 6 days before that is the first story that breaks, cia actually adrew bitea. boston globe, washington post, cia russia tried to help trump win the cia concluded in a secret assessment that russia intervened in the 2016 election to help donald trump win the
backfired, i would argue it did not backfire. look at what happened to trump administration. chuck todd cut me off when i started talking about de decembr 15. i am not cut you on you of, december 15, 2016, text from peter strzok to lisa page. think our sisters, the cia, have begun leaking like mad, scored and wary, they are kicking to over drive. during the transition. a little bit after the election. 6 days before that is the first story that breaks, cia actually adrew bitea. boston globe, washington post, cia russia tried to help trump win the cia concluded in a secret assessment that russia intervened in the 2016 election