that the sutures were not required. the injuries on the back of the defendant s head consistent with one strike against a concrete surface? yes. why do you say that? because if you hit the head one time, it is consistent with having gotten those two injuries at that one time. greta, i heard that, then i heard she is not even the one that performed the autopsy. what do you think? reporter: the autopsy, when you bring that up, that to me will be a key witness because trayvon martin isn t here to tell his side of the story, he is the decedent. george zimmerman told his story multiple times. listen carefully to the one that did the examination, a forensic expert. what is going to be key is if you look at the trajectory of the bullet and the clothes, does it look like the sweatshirt was close to the chest, which would suggest they re standing next to each other, or was it far away from the chest.
very strong for the defense. the defendant not having to take the stand, getting in multiple consistent statements, then with a female officer that greta mentioned, they talked about religion and how surprised he seemed to be, upset that trayvon martin was deceased, and talked about god and the catholic faith, and that it is not okay to kill somebody, he was very concerned about it. how is that going to show some kind of implied malice for a second degree murder when you have someone so concerned about the decedent, surprised he is even dead, upset, and asking about that, talking about the sanctity of life. that was helpful to the defense as well. if i had to blink, rub my eyes, i would think they were in the defense case, the prosecution already rested. interesting you say that, kimberly. you know how the media, we sit in one section of the courtroom, there s a little bit of mumbling, has the prosecution team joined the defense team? that s the cynicism. but remember, only in the se
had and it wasn t an extensive interview. i can attest to what the interview with officer singleton and the walk through was based on what i saw. that would be more fair. i kind of went there to move things along because i was kind of focused on trying to identify who the decedent was at that time. who what. i was more focused on trying to identify the december the that the point. so the interview with him was rather short, if you can call it an interview. but i ll try. okay. but the one, tower talking about the interview at midnight. yes, sir. that s where you had at that point and let me open up the comparison for a moment to say also want you to tell us of any discrepancies in the recreation video that existed either in your interview with him at midnight or investigator or officer singleton s interview
you know going in, i agree you take your witnesses as you find them. the prosecution had to know she was going to be an awful witness. don t put her on first. put your case on and save her for last in case you can get away with not putting her on at all. i agree with her. here is the issue. i feel sorry for her as a person, forced into the situation. i agree with that, by the way. she can t read, has lit racy problems. the public comments have been cruel to her. she didn t ask to be put in this situation. in terms of the decedent, the so-called victim in this case, she s revealed a tremendous lot that goes beyond cultural norms. let s play where she reveals what anna and i were discussing, that she can t read the letter that she and the friend supposedly written and she said she had wrote about the shooting. and you and ms. sur talked
sidewalk, laying this way. it s still the person with the black shirt on top and the red shirt on bottom. is this now where they re in the straddle position? correct. with trayvon martin on top? yeah. i could not draw that. that s fine. i just want to orient the jury, that s what we re talking about. yes. big moment. what do you make of it? so far i think this is the best witness for the defense. it s not a defense witness. this is still the prosecution s case, but this guy is credible, has no axe to grind, neutral, and he puts trayvon martin on top of george zimmerman, and if he is not punching him, he appears to be punching him. that s huge in terms of who was the aggressor here. very important piece of testimony. just in fairness, the counterpoint, other witnesses helped the prosecution a little bit but i can t disagree with you in saying that any witness who puts the decedent on top is going to support the idea of