could formulate a justification for that use of deadly force eight bullets fired at his back. it is hard to get there and i don t know how we do it. mark o mara? well, first of all, the condolences to the family and the restraint of anthony in how he is reacting to this is amazing. thank god we have the videotape, because i agree with charles what he is saying that we know that law enforcement officers, and everybody have to only use deadly force in response to deadly force when you are truly in fair of great bodily injury to yourself and i don t care what happened before that video picked up we know that he was running away, and at that point even if the officer was upset for whatever reason it does not justify the deadly force. and another concerning thing in that video is how he seemed to suggest maybe that there was some felony occurring by bringing over thetaser and dropping it next to the decedent
you saw it. forget it. stop whining. i m so bitter over syracuse. i know. serious news out of south carolina after a police officer claimed that he had to shoot a man, the decedent is black, police officer white a video by a by stander shows a different story. watch what we have of it. stand by. my apology. i should have washed the viewers that is a graphic piece of video. that is a man losing his life there arthur. now the police officer has been charged. tell us why. okay. what the district attorney s
the judgment. it s a travesty. that should be a lawsuit that they can t see now arthur. that you can see this at home. go ahead, mark. the standard has to be conclusive evidence to reverse the call. the video that i saw again i have no bone, i don t care who wins, clearly shows 100% without a doubt that maybe the ball was touched. if you can t show it conclusively conclusively what do you think, megyn? you saw it. forget it. stop whining. i m so bitter over syracuse. i know. serious news out of south carolina after a police officer claimed that he had to shoot a man, the decedent is black, police officer white a video by a by stander shows a different story. watch what we have of it. stand by.
hinges upon whether the fbi agent reasonably feared death or great bodily harm. what would we expect to happen? you sit the fbi agent down and say, tell us how you reasonably feared death or great bodily harm. in this case that wasn t done, megyn. they didn t ever interview that agent. and through this lawsuit the family is hoping to get some answers. it says cair to sue the fbi. i don t think that s right arthur. i think it s the family of the, you know the decedent, and cair is just supporting the funding of the lawsuit, and they support the lawsuit, cair which has been designated a terrorist group by qatar. in any event go ahead. so, mark, here s the thing. yes. you know in your current role as a criminal defense attorney, if you were going to investigate this case, and somebody called your client in who s the target of the investigation you would not allow him to speak to the state prosecutor who s talking
hinges upon whether the fbi agent reasonably feared death or great bodily harm. what would we expect to happen? you sit the fbi agent down and say, tell us how you reasonably feared death or great bodily harm. in this case that wasn t done, megyn. they didn t ever interview that agent. and through this lawsuit the family is hoping to get some answers. it says cair to sue the fbi. i don t think that s right arthur. i think it s the family of the, you know the decedent, and cair is just supporting the funding of the lawsuit, and they support the lawsuit, cair which has been designated a terrorist group by qatar. in any event go ahead. so, mark, here s the thing. yes. you know in your current role as a criminal defense attorney, if you were going to investigate this case, and somebody called your client in who s the target of the investigation you would not allow him to speak to the state prosecutor who s talking to him.