that says that deficit reduction shouldn t actually even be a national priority right now, as we slowly recover from the most brutal recession since the great depression, there is a strong case to be made that the government should just borrow away. the government should take advantage of how low interest rates are, should take advantage of a market in which the world is eager to loan us money. we could bore relike crazy right now, invest that money in job creation and infrastructure and economic growth. we could worry about debt creation when we are full by back on our feet. if we took that path we could get back on our feet faster if question use that spending to invest in our economic strength. but the political world is going to reject if the political world is going to reject or ignore that school of thought, if we are going to be all ringing our hands about the debt and the deficit about the debt all the time, we should at least get our facts straight about who has been better
government should just borrow away. the government should take advantage of how low interest rates are, should take advantage of a market in which the world is eager to loan us money. we could borrow like crazy right now, invest that money in job creation and infrastructure and economic growth. we could worry about debt creation when we are full by back on our feet. if we took that path we could get back on our feet faster if question use that spending to invest in our economic strength. but the political world is going to reject if the political world is going to reject or ignore that school of thought, if we are going to be all wringing our hands about the debt and the deficit about the debt all the time, we should at least get our facts straight about who has been better for the deficit and who has been worse. no peacocks, no jerks, no whiners. it sounds good in english, but it s going to sound even better when they put it in latin on the back of a quarter. stress sweat. it s diff
a very firm stance at present on the left, which is we are not touching entitlement programs. are you at all concerned about getting the dems to the table in terms of a broader deal in terms of the on ci of what we re hearing? i think what you re hearing from democrats is we have no intention of undermining the security of our seniors or people who need health care. that does not mean we re not going to look at the long-term fiscal stainability of those programs. i think we are prepared to do that, but we want to make sure nobody who is relying on social security and which frankly has not been part of the debt creation, it is part of the fiscal situation that we re confronting, but it s not created the debt. and medicare, as well, which is absolutely essential for the health of so many millions of
prosper. that s the idea of america and that s why america s the greatest nation on earth. i m barack obama. i approve this message. so how does mitt romney, michael steele, inspire people to feel like they can prosper like he did? i ll ask you one more time. because you look at that interview and he s like he s very upset success is being attacked. it is. it is being attacked. only very few people great commercial. the president has nice floury words. we re looking at family members and friends dealing and struggling in this economy. what have you done to lift people out of that. look at the policies. look at how you have, through spending, debt creation, and those types of weights and barriers have been placed on people how do you move the country forward when it s obvious you have it. that s what mitt romney needs to talk about, how his policies will be different is there something about his policies that would help people feel hope again they could
ultimately what has become a failure, 11 of the 12 nails in the coffin. is obama implicated in the failure of the super committee? you could second guess his actions, but he comes across as part of the problem here, as this rolls out. you can t escape it. you have democrats and republicans not getting anything done. he s the leader of the democratic party. meghan, do you think he pays a price for this? and i think he needs to start taking culpable for this. i understand it was the congress and the senate taking blame for this, but but when he had control of the house and senate, a great deal was being done. they weren t deficit hawks. but the numbers on the productivity of the congress under nancy pelosi in terms of the pure amount of legislative lawmaking work that was going on versus this one is not the debt creation. no, no.