Ring this blic hlt vid19 is tthree times in theormal cle, oneerso thoronavirld kick off a snballffect that to leadsp 59,000 new iections. Think abouthat and think about the way wepeteere. Members travelrom theirme spoto nveneaoronirus hot on after mth after mon. Mcgovern w e cod symptomatic, carers nonetheless. Coeningongrs must notur tech nolling has changed considerably over the last 231 years. There are now toolles available that make temporary Committee Proceedings and remote voting on the house floor possible. Not offense, just temporarily during this emergency. Now some on the other side seem to think that temporarily embracing technology during this pandemic is a radical idea. Well, let me say this loud and clear to my colleagues, mr. Speaker. If anyone tells you that you would be giving away your vote with remote voting by approximately, this is just a lie, plain and simple. It is just not true. What would be radical is if this hoes did nothing, if we made members decide betwee
Us covid19 is up to three times more contagious than the flu. That means in a normal cycle of this virus, just one person with coronavirus could kick off a Snowball Effect that leaves up to 59,000 new infection. Think about that. And then, think about the way we normally operate here. Members travel frequently from their home states, some of which are coronavirus hotspots, to convene together in the capitol complex. Then, we travel back home at the end of the week and we repeat this process month after month after month. Along the way, we come in contact with fellow travelers. Colleagues, the general public, and the hundreds and hundreds of people who helped make this house operate. There is no telling who among them could have compromised immune systems. The existing conditions or other heightened risk for illness, but we know just how easy this virus spreads among those with strong immune systems. Choices thathe each one of us makes are especially important. Not just about protecting
78, hou resolution 965 authorg mote vg oceeding due to novelote coronavirus dor other puos. Thear o tempor purs to house resolutn 967, the resolution i consideredead and debatabl for on hour, eal divided and controlled by the chair and ranking mber on th comttee the gentleman from husett mr. Mcgern, and the ntleman from oahoma,r. Le, ch wil tro 20 minutes. Mr. Mcve i asknanimous revise and extend their remks. The speaker prtempore witho ctn. Mrmcgovern ware in the mit of a pandemic the likesf ich thed hasnseen in his instution, which adopted to cllges and apt contie tlegislate in, ring this blic hlt vid19 is tthree times in theormal cle, oneerso thoronavirld kick off to 59,000 new iections. P think abouthat and think about the way wepeteere. Members travelrom theirme spoto nveneere togetr ot the capitol comex and we travel back home and we repeat is proceon after mth after mon. Mcgovern we cod symptomatic, carers nonetheless. Coeningongrs must notur techlogy has changed years. Ablyver
Okay, the rules committee will come to order. Before i give my opening statement, i just want to read a guidance from the attending physician. And we asked him specifically about the use of face coverings during proceedings like these. And while he is not mandated their use, he did share that, and i quote, my preference is that members retain their face covers when speaking as speaking is an activity which can release virus particles, especially if the speaking is of high spirited nature. And ive never had a meeting in the rules committee that hasnt been of a high spirited nature. So were going to leave it up to individual members to decide. But i think i will to be cautious here, im going to keep mine on. Others will be mindful of the reason why there is guidance on this issue. It has been roughly three months since the First Community transmission of covid19 was discovered in the United States. Since that time, our world has changed dramatically. There are now more than 1. 3 million
Statement from me and from mr. Cole then well go tow our distinguished witnesses. Today the rules committee will hold a hearing to discuss how the constitution separated powers between the legislative and executive branches and how the balance of power between these branches has shifted over time. We are doing this in the hopes of finding concrete Bipartisan Solutions to better ensure congress is playing the role our nations founders envisioned. Thats a lot, i know. And while a constitutional debate may be fun for law students and legal scholars and mr. Raskin [ laughter ] the it wasnt fun when i was yeah. For the rest of us, it could feel a little in the weeds. So, so for the rest of us, let me simplify. You know, we throw around the phrase, the peoples house, a lot around here, but this really is but this really is about whether we remain the institution that our nations founders created to be the voice of the people. The constitution entrusts congress with deciding how to spend fede