talking about. ana is wearing very patiently looking lovely and red waiting. you said there s been no evidence. the investigation has not colluded. no report has been put out. who knows? we don t know. we have no idea if there s evidence of collusion or not. anna, to you. that was a press conference cleaning up what he said on air force one and let me read back to you, a reporter said to the president last november, did russia attempt to meddle in the u.s. conversations? the president says, he said he didn t meddle. he said he didn t meddle and the reporter says do you believe him? well, i can t stand there and argue with him. so that s what he initially said. that s a recurring theme with him. where he attacks the u.s. intelligence community and somebody reminds him that he is the president of the united states and what that means for those agencies and then he cleans it up. we see this over and over again. i think it s no coincidence that
do you trust the fbi? do you trust the fbi? we re going soo-to-see. i am very disturbed as is the general as is everybody else that is intelligent. when you look at five months this is the late great rosemary woods with a step, right? this is a large scale version. here to debate ana navarro and mark water. mark, let me begin with you. it was a remarkable important interview. they covered a lot of ground. but the evidence that raj shah is pointing to to say there should be no question almost as if the president has never equivocated on russia and meddling in the election and how it talks about russian president vladimir putin. we just heard last week, he was asked, do you trust the fbi and he said we ll see. what do you make of the white house argument? i think we re talking about two separate issues.