as nothing more than a publicity stubts. stunt. andy scholes has the bleacher report. yeah, the women s teach has been in a fight with the u.s. soccer federation over what they consider fair compensation for years. and the federation announced tuesday that it offered identical contract proposals to both the men s and women s teams. they also offered to work to even the prize money from fifa for world cups. the men got $400 million for the 2018 world cup, the women $30 million in 2019. but the union representing the women says it is still not a good deal tweeting that pr opportunities will not bring us any closer to a fair agreement. in contrast we are committed to bargaining in good faith to achieve equal pay and safest working conditions as possible and the proposal made to us does neither. the usff fired back at the women s team saying that they are trying to make a good deal
playing around and make a deal tweeting that they posted slowest economic number since 1990. and the new policies makes so much chance for china to finally do a real deal and stop playing around. march 1 is the deadline for an agreement. so a pivotal couple of weeks. well, now that senator kamala harris is formally in the race for president, who is next? another democrat crodrops a hin next. and anthony scaramucci in the big brother house telling us how he got fired from the white house.
democrats saying after that meeting that talks shouldn t move forward until the government reopens. they called that meeting with president trump contentious. trump described that same meeting as productive and said the government would remain partially shuttered indefinitely until he gets funding for his border wall and he s holding firm on his demand for that $5.6 billion sum that house republicans included in a bill that they passed as one of their last acts in the house majority. even though previously the president had signaled he might be willing to back down off that sum in order to get a deal. but president trump has been showing some flexibility when it comes to what might qualify as a wall. despite promising supports in 2016 an actual concrete wall, president trump has now hinted that he might try to spin a see-through barrier of some kind or steel slats as a fulfillment of that campaign promise. he demanded democrats make a deal tweeting, i don t care that most of the worker
government while talks continue. trump saying that meeting was productive, but signaling willingness to keep the government partially shuttered until he gets funding for the border wall and holding firm at the $5.6 billion sum that house republicans passed in a bill that died in the senate, one of the last legislative acts when they had control of the house majority. trump is increasingly flexible it seems what would qualify as a wall, steel slats, see through barrier, seeming to benld d on fulfillment of a campaign promise. trump is reprising a claim of ideology of furloughed workers as he calls on democrats to make a deal tweeting i don t care most of the workers not being paid are democrats, i want to stop the shutdown as soon as we re in agreement on strong border security. i am in the white house ready to go, where are the dems. this is misleading because heads of federal employees unions pointed out that workers not getting paid now belong to both
envisioning they will give work permits for these people to live in mexico along the border or elsewhere in mexico while they are waiting for these asylum rulings which could take months or years. it wouldn t be they living in some type of housing. it is you can live legally in mexico while this process plays out. i want to bring this here with you. i think one of the many things that is extraordinary is the president thinks it is a done deal tweeting out in two tweets that this policy will be put in place. sit a big win for the administration and it will be popular with most americans. it will be very popular for him. i want to ask a question though to the reporter. please. what are the considerations on the mexican side? what are political considerations? why would they do this?