this proposed deal isn t worth nearly what they say it is it doesn t require the sacklers to pay back a dime of the billions of dollars they sucked out of purdue. reporter: the massachusetts attorney general, one of 25 that reject the idea of settling with purdue on the other side, 29 attorneys general who support the deal including states like ohio and west virginia where opioids flooded in purdue s chairman said they chose not to spend all their money battling lawsuits. we think the best answer is put the company on the table, have a settlement so that all of the value can as soon as possible go to the unfortunate victims of the opioid crisis. reporter: on friday, new york s attorney general said in a court filing she found at least $1 billion in wire transfers by the sackler family fueling claims they were trying to hide assets a sackler representative denied those claims saying they were decade-old transfers that were perfectly legal and appropriate. the family pledged $3 b
inspect immediately. we re giving them 24 days. military sites can go uninspected. here s the truth. inspectors will be allowed daily access to iran s key nuclear sites. by the way, nuclear material isn t something you hide in the closet. the bottom line is if iran cheats, we can catch them and we will. second, there are those who argue the deal isn t strong enough because some of the limitations on the civilian nuclear program expire in 15 years. a 10 to 15 years. over the next 10 to 15 years. in about 10 to 15 years. without there deal, the scenarios the critics warn about happening in 15 years could happen six months from now. by killing this deal, congress would not merely pave iran s pathway to a bomb. it would accelerate it. third, the number of critics say the deal isn t worth it. randle will get billions of dollars in sanctions relief.
uninspected. here s the truth. inspectors will be allowed daily access to iran s key nuclear sites. by the way, nuclear material isn t something you hide in the closet. the bottom line is if iran cleats, we can catch them and we will. second. there are those who argue the deal isn t strong enough because some of the limitations on the civilian nuclear program expire in 15 years. a 10 to 15 years. over the next 10 to 15 years. in about 10 to 15 years. without there deal, the scenarios the critics warn about happening in 15 years could happen six months from now. by killing this deal, congress would not merely pave iran s pathway to a bomb. it would accelerate it. third, the number of critics say the deal isn t worth it. randle will get billions of dollars in sanctions relief. over $100 billion will flow into iran. iran will deep more than bfls dollars. hundreds of billions of
there are those who argue the deal isn t strong enough because some of the limitations on the civilian nuclear program expire in 15 years. a 10 to 15 years. over the next 10 to 15 years. in about 10 to 15 years. without there deal, the scenarios the critics warn about happening in 15 years could happen six months from now. by killing this deal, congress would not merely pave iran s pathway to a bomb. it would accelerate it. third, the number of critics say the deal isn t worth it. randle will get billions of dollars in sanctions relief. over $100 billion will flow into iran. iran will deep more than billions of dollars. hundreds of billions of dollars. an argument is effectively sanctions against any resolution. whatever benefit they may claim from sanction relief pales in comparison to the danger it could pose with a nuclear
would not merely pave iran s pathway to a bomb, it would accelerate it. third, the number of critics say the deal isn t worth it because iran will get billions of dollars in sanctions relief. let s be clear, the international sanctions were put in place precisely to get iran to agree to constraints on its program. that s the point of sanctions. any negotiated agreement with iran would involve sanctions relief. so an argument sanctions relief is effectively argument against any diplomatic resolution of this issue. it is true that, if iran lives up to its commitments it will gain access to roughly $56 billion of its own money. revenue frozen overseas by other countries. but the notion that this will be a game-changer with all this