it was a special military operation to demilitarise and de nazification of ukraine. then russian propaganda was telling that this special military operation has to stop nato from approaching to russian borders. but then people see that finland is going tojoin nato, and that borders with nato will be even bigger. then russian propaganda tells some stories about russian values and how the west is trying to destroy it as well. so, the idea is changing every month, and it looks like a lot of people are not buying this. is there a generational split here within russia and russian public opinion? i mean, mindfulthat, for a start, probably the audience for your youtube channel tends to the
but if you don t have many friends in the world, as is the case with russia and is the case with belarus, then you have to get along with the ones you do have and nourish those friendships. and that s why putin keeps relying on lukashenko and lukashenko keeps relying on putin. so when lukashenko says, well, i m happy to have belarus participate in this war, it s not exactly as if he has a choice to say, no, i don t want belarus to participate, simply because he s very dependent on putin and indeed on russia. so it s less generous than it sounds. and how much do you think russia is likely to make any gains? if we compare this with a year ago and it seems almost like a different world a year ago when russia launched this invasion and said that it was going to take ukraine and to replace the regime, it was talking about regime change, de nazification.
de-nazification, the ukrainian language not having a right language, the ukrainian language is not a real language, it s just bad russian. there is no fear. there is resilience. there s bravery. all we need is swifter and more powerful support than we re getting now. translator: and this dignity, ukrainian dignity, is very important. that s why we have this resilience. russia keeping wondering what s happening here? i don t understand why that s so keen to know what we re up to. i think there should be more interest in their own history, their own culture to preserve it, if they still have it.
informed as to what happened to mussolini right before he died. in that one fateful week in 1945, you have got mussolini trying to flee the country on the 25th. you have him shot on the 28th. you have got him strung up upside down in milan the 29th and then it is the 30th, the very next day, when hitler killed him is ef in his bunker. and maybe learning what happened to mussolini is part of what led to his decision to do that. but even though both germany and italy were defeated in world war ii, both germany and italy surrendered, and the fascist leaders of those countries died within 48 hours of each other, coincidentally or not, germany subsequently, famously, went through an aggressive decades-long painful process of de-nazification. plumbing the depths of why their
kampf. he said all the time he had to think about how he was going to seize power for good the next time, which he did. incidentally, historians are pretty sure that hitler was informed as to what happened to mussolini right before he died. in that one fateful week in 1945, you have got mussolini trying to flee the country on the 25th. you have him shot on the 28th. you have got him strung up upside down in milan the 29th and then it is the 30th, the very next day, when hitler killed himself in his bunker. and maybe learning what happened to mussolini is part of what led to his decision to do that. but even though both germany and italy were defeated in world war ii, both germany and italy surrendered, and the fascist leaders of those countries died within 48 hours of each other, coincidentally or not, germany subsequently, famously, went through an aggressive decades-long painful process of de-nazification. plumbing the depths of why their country went that direction, committing to t