that would undermine it. we have got to get to the bottom of it because clearly some explanation. if you are just asking me, i think being financially compromised is likely what is at the bottom of it. hence the reluctance to produce tax returns. we have to protect this investigation and now bolton is in on the attempt to demean it as a witch hunt or fake news. whatever the word de jure is. that depicts desperation. they are doing everything they can to undermine the investigation. we should point out what john bolton casually referred to as witch hunts. for criminal sabotage of an american election. the national security adviser of the united states referred to
that? it would be fantastic, remember every time there is some news that creates negative speculation or speculation that this could be deeply involving president trump, you start to hear the term constitutional crisis. none of this has been closed a constitutional crisis. nevertheless, when it is uttered, put out there, it has a major negative impact on the stock market. neil: referring to the stock market. there de jure about an improving economy, right? they are jittery about good news being bad news. yeah. jittery about that and inflation. we have lumber prices hitting all-time high, crushing homebuilding stocks. crude oil near $70, pulled back a little bit. aluminum at a 7-year high. these are things generally associated with great economies. nevertheless, some anxiety about how the federal handler because in the past when they have botched a big. neil: think you. so much, means markets and the political world, the upside for
about daca, immigration, justice, which we were just talking about, the fbi, nafta, sort of the discussion de jure that occurs. and i think that we re reminding him that his base is unhappy and they represent his base. i think they believe. and that telling him he better shape up on this stuff. and i think the president who, by the way, can sit down with anyone in the world and invited them and of course, don king, to come to mar-a-lago this week. and i think it s a comfort level for him. kaitlan, you were down there this weekend, down in mar-a-lago, right? that s right. i was. were you invited to dinner? for some reason, i think my invitation got lost in the mail. but it s interesting to see who is there. who he is surrounded by. sean hannity, judge jeanine pirro, and who s not there, john kelly, dan scavino, these typical aides who usually travel
i m sorry. i wouldn t want it done to me. i m sorry. shannon, powerful moment there, the questions aren t going away. the white house didn t answer any, but they re going to have to ultimately. they ll try to and deny for as long as possible. the story hasn t caught some people feel like the story hasn t caught as much traction as we would have seen it catch in other administrations because of all the noise and everything else going on. and my sense around the white house has been there are so many other dramas de jure this is a roundi rounding era this thing going on. being able to see the person, look them in the eye through the television in a way, mcdougal s interview was compelling, seemed genuine. we have stormy daniels. i think that adds a new layer, texture to the story. it becomes a bit more real to people who are watching at home.
controls 20% of of our uranium extraction, and has de facto and de jure exercise. they can control whether or not it s put you know, extracted or not they own the rights to it. to me, that s the bigger question. not one agency. you can believe two things. you can believe this was a very, very disturbing deal, and also think it s completely irrelevant to what s going on right now. you can be disturbed by that, but also recognize that there s really no new developments in that story. and why would this have, you know, become a big story the week before the first indictments would come down? so, again, you know, you don t have to say there s nothing here. but you can also say, this has this is a complete distraction from this real story of the russian interference in the election. in fact, this was raised during the election. and it was investigated. and fact checkers have said, there is nothing to hillary clinton hillary clinton did not even sit on the committee. no, sh