and seems to be active when people are day dreaming. furthermore, perhaps this tooblt daydream or make new ideas is one thing that underlies the idea that we re a genius. let me go at that just one more bit there because you talked about making new ideas but also about making connections. is genius primarily synthetic, bringing together synthesizing what exists in the world, or is it primarily novel and innovative creating something new no one has thought about before, whether it s a piece of music or a scientific finding? i think it s important to differentiate between expert and a genius. an expert might be someone very adept at a certain skill. but a genius in a popular mindset is someone who tha creates something new, that pushes the boundaries and brings us where we ve never been. you may have a great parent but then you have picasso. you may have a great scientist, but then you have albert einstein. danielle part of what happens, i think even in our
so should it be a fine? should it be criminalized or something that s just more of a social push to get people aware? what about day dreaming? are they going to fine us for day dreaming? excuse me, sir, i don t think you re focused on walk. you seem to be thinking about something else. what about walking your dog? that could be considered distracting, too. and then it s the definition of what is distracted walking? is this distracted walking if i just look down for one second? yes. according to the new rules. well, i don t know. it s unplowed ground. what about the young men who see an attractive girl and glance to the left. fifty dollars fine. that s distracting for another reason. still distracting! this could go places. 25 bucks. coming up, she cries every time she hears a one direction song. is this normal or nuts? dr. keith ablow has that diagnosis. why is john stossel jumping
smoke your joints in the living room, ended up doing time later. i see as parent with the first one, you have expectations, we have to make this one perfect and hold them up higher and pressure is there. the second one, you can t maintain that and get more realistic and they ll be fine, just don t mess up. i would argue that the oldest child is probably the smartest, but it doesn t always show, clearly. this is what the author of the piece that pegs this conversation let s call your brother. it s my sister. oh, excuse me. clearly. this is how the author describes himself. i m a first child myself, well known within the family for being unorganize, forget until and persistently caught day dreaming in the middle of conversations. that s how i would describe my sister. the first born, i hate to rip on her i m number two on the family, all of the attention is put on first one.
into a fountain, that should be enough to get you to stop texting and walking. steve: remember back before people had texting machines, personal digital assisted pda s, remember when people used to walk around and think and not constantly think i ve got to update people? brian: i did. steve: i ve got to talk on the phone all the time. brian: i would never think. that was me. i saw this. i saw one of ainsley s stories at the 5:00 a.m. i don t know if it s valid now. but i heard that one of the things is the worst thing duke in a car is day dream. how can you legislate against day dreaming? elisabeth: there is no time for day dreaming anymore. who day dreams? brian: i know, cause you weren t driving in the city. but when you re wherever you live, i have no idea, but when you re driving on the open road, if you were caught day dreaming, could you get a ticket? steve: if it s distracted driving. i saw that. brian: you were thinking about your high school years. steve:
dangerous thing you can do behind the wheel? day dreaming may be far more deadly. the insurance group found that 62 percent of drivers in fatal crashes were lost in thought. that compares with 12 percent using cell phones. uncle sam may have more than their hands in your pocket. the agency says they don t need a warrant to read your e-mails or tweets. diane macedo has more. new documents from the irs suggest the agency may be reading e-mails without obtaining a warrant. that s according to the civil liberties union through freedom of information request. the documents showed the irs said the 4th amendment does not protect e-mails because internet users do not have a reasonable