Today. Today you can sense the chant coming from the trump people. Listen closely and you can pick up a slightly different rhythm right now of dont lock me up, dont lock me up yesterday it was reported first by the Wall Street Journal that trumps former National Security adviser Michael Flynn, the guy saw there going after hillary, his lauer is looking to get flynn immunity in order to testify about what he knows. According to his lawyer trumps former National Security adviser certainly has a story to tell. This morning President Trump tweeted that mike flynn should ask for immunity in is that this is a witch hunt an excuse for a big election lost by the democrats and the media of historic proportion. At the meeting today Sean Spicer Conexplained the president was trying to convey his desire to see flynn testify. If you actually stop for a second and realize what the president is doing he is saying do whatever to do to go up and make it clear what happened,
take whatever precaution you
exactly what took place. greg, it seems to me that when this thing is fully aired by the press and by the committee to some extent but more by the press we are going to see the materials give to mr. nunes on tuesday night last week are basically the ones they are going to be giving out. but when they gave them to him in a special bay, almost like giving an exclusive to a reporter, build it up and make it seem alarming and exculpatory for the president, make the president look good on his dawn patrol tweets. i get the feeling it s not going to be that useful once it comes out in a normal fashion. what do you make of it? what s there? i think that s true, the more we ve learned about the documents, and we are still a long way from learning everything about them, it sounds less and less alarming, right? you peel back where nunes started, which was very uncomfortable, boy, the american public wouldn t like to see this stuff. then he has a conversation with adam schiff, and schiff says
office, and at this point i wish i could say more. we have no choice. the speaker isn t going to knock him off. he s not going to recuse himself. in the final analysis, we re going to be reading the same documents, and we have been. we re going to be interviewing the same witnesses, and i do believe we re going to have that open hearing. and i do believe we re going back to meetings with the admiral rogers and mr. comey to find out exactly what took place. greg, it seems to me that when this thing is fully aired by the press and to the committee to some extent, we re going to see the materials that were given to mr. nunes on tuesday night last week were basically the ones they re going to be giving out now. but when they gave it to him in a special way, it was almost like giving an exclusive to a reporter. they were going to build it up and seem really alarming and news somehow exculpatory to the president, make the president look good on his dawn patrol tweets.
i could say more. we have no choice. the speaker isn t going to knock him off. he s not going to recuse himself. in the final analysis, we re going to be reading the same documents, and we have been. we re going to be interviewing the same witnesses, and i do believe we re going to have that open hearing. and i do believe we re going back to meetings with the admiral rogers and mr. comey to find out exactly what took place. greg, it seems to me that when this thing is fully aired by the press and to the committee to some extent, we re going to see the materials that were given to mr. nunes on tuesday night last week were basically the ones they re going to be giving out now. but when they gave it to him in a special way, it was almost like giving an exclusive to a reporter. they were going to build and up ask make it seem alarming and somehow exculpatory to the president, make the president look good on his dawn patrol tweets. i get the feeling it s not going to be that useful once i