And golden gate avenue. The proposed site is located along the district along the Western Addition neighborhood district. It currently operates three blocks north of the proposed site and its vacating the space and moving to 1109 fillmore, which is occupied by a limit the restaurant use as well. According to new information by the project sponsor since the release of the report they want to relocate in the immediate area. As already presented the applicant has submitted two conditional use authorization requests before you, the first to relocate his existing building to the 1109 fillmore site and the alternate at 3015 geary boulevard is the one that was previously heard under item 156789 the subject neighborhood is characterized by a diverse mix of goods and services. The subject nineblock district span president bush street, southward to mcallister street. The corridor is wellserved by transit. Staff noted 14 vacant storefronts in the neighborhood. And approximately 17. 6 of the comme
Needs to be done. Commissioner wu as part of the motion i want the Entertainment Commission to be part of the motion. if we are talking about an independent analysis as proposed by commissioner moore, and if its mr. Saltar, it is only fair that the two i dont want to say sides share the cost. If it is independent it cannot be funded by one side i dont know the project sponsor is comfortable with that or not at this point. I dont want to have a series of battles between two experts. This is this, that is that. My testing method with this. The other guy says yeah but my testing method was this. I dont think the commissioner wants to get into that. we are a small family business. We only have so many resources. It is hard to go against the Big Powerhouse like sundance. if we are having an independent expert mr. Saltars name has been, but it could be your guy, i dont care. It could be wanted both you, kabuki, the spas, the theatre shares teh cost. i agree to that. the Planning Commission w
Only fair that the two i dont want to say sides share the cost. If it is independent it cannot be funded by one side i dont know the project sponsor is comfortable with that or not at this point. I dont want to have a series of battles between two experts. This is this, that is that. My testing method with this. The other guy says yeah but my testing method was this. I dont think the commissioner wants to get into that. we are a small family business. We only have so many resources. It is hard to go against the Big Powerhouse like sundance. if we are having an independent expert mr. Saltars name has been, but it could be your guy, i dont care. It could be wanted both you, kabuki, the spas, the theatre shares teh cost. i agree to that. the Planning Commission would like both parties, the building owner, the lounge to have an initially agreedupon sound consultant and share the cost. If they cannot agree on the part of the does analysis they both can do separate analysis and they can prov
I dont think the commissioner wants to get into that. we are a small family business. We only have so many resources. It is hard to go against the Big Powerhouse like sundance. if we are having an independent expert mr. Saltars name has been, but it could be your guy, i dont care. It could be wanted both you, kabuki, the spas, the theatre shares teh cost. i agree to that. the Planning Commission would like both parties, the building owner, the lounge to have an initially agreedupon sound consultant and share the cost. If they cannot agree on the part of the does analysis they both can do separate analysis and they can provide those to each other; they can do across brief 23 weeks before the hearing. and i would like to have the scope worked up before hand by the engineer and submitted to the Entertainment Commissions engineer for review and approval. is that amendment to the motion agreeable . agreeable only to the extent that i am not dictating some kind of 5050 split across having to