provide a buffer from the jet blasts, but in st. martin it seems there just isn t enough space to do that. ana? incredible video there. renee marsh, thanks. people might get a rush out of standing in the wake of the jet engines, there s no denying the dangers. i want to bring in a former faa safety inspector. david, first of all, good to see you. good to see you, ana. long before you went to work for the faa you said you used to do this sort of a thing as a child in the 70s? yeah. stapleton airport had a road on the east side of the runway and you could park your car and let the airplanes land above you. i remember as a young child, 5 or 6 years old my father placed me on the hood and trying to hang on as the airplane landed, it would blow me off and throw me on the ground. that was a few years ago, maybe like 50 years ago. yeah. a few years ago.
he is supposed to come into the white house now and handle and oversee the response to the russia investigation. not only legally, but also in the press. we will still have to find out more specifically about what he s going to be handling on and we ll bring you that information as soon as we hear from officials in the white house. boris sanchez, thank you. let s talk about this thickening plot. joining us former undercover kgb spy is jack borski. and also with us editor at large for time magazine, david von drily. he s the man behind this cover. but jack i ll start with you. take a look at who is in this meeting. a lobbyist who is admitted to being an exsoviet military and still an unidentified person. does this seem like a russian
intelligence operation to you? it s an interesting collection of people. in preparation for this, i refreshed my memory. we don t have good data on russian intelligence and soviet intelligence but there s some really, really good data on intelligence out of my old country the german democratic republic, because it became public knowledge. one out of ten think about this for a moment. one out of ten people had official/unofficial connection to the stasi, the secret service. so these kind of tentacles you expect to have been in place in the old soviet union and, you know, russia is just it s a child of the soviet union. i guarantee you at least there was at least one if not multiple folks who had some intelligence connection in that meeting. david, i want to read you a portion of your cover piece for
and the trump organization was totally we re just looking at i m looking at the right side of the screen there, gentlemen. these are live pictures of president trump. he s at bedminster golf club. so there s a lot of crowd there, as he s spending the weekend in new jersey. back to our reporting, i m curious, jack, given your ties to the kgb if you ever heard of this person, rinat akhmetshin, before. no. that s a different generation. i m sorry. all right. well, the big question that remains, david, is what did president trump know and when did he know it? you point out that just hours after this russia meeting was scheduled, then candidate trump announced to the world he was drafting a major speech to make public all things that have happened with the clinton. just a coincidence, do you think? well, the problem is whether intentionally or unintentionally president trump and his administration have made it very
e-mails and based on what you said about just the tentacles of the kremlin, do you think the russian government would have been aware of this meeting and if so, what kind of information even without even knowing what was discussed could have been gleaned by the russians just by having this meeting? first of all, aware of it, yes. connected to it with plausible deniability. but that would not have been as much as, you know, getting information from the trump campaign. but you know creating a whole bunch of havoc which, you know, if that was the plan they succeeded beyond their wildest expectations. david, you have a new time cover, red handed is the cover. put it up, guys. the russia scandal hits home, you say. people can read into this as they wish, but what s the message you wanted to get across here? that this is coming not from