Im fascinated by by but im just not satisfied with how we are india. I realize limitations once again to what you said. Let me just frame it differently perhaps to whats a little more comfortable. What i would love to know is the debate that is happening, is it a typical, i know its not a useful description, moderate versus hardliner or is is happening within the hardline camp . This is all extramusical for everybody. The debate as i mentioned is between across the board. You can find on the hardliners, revolutionary guard, foreigners, think tank, policymakers, professors at university. They are all debating it to think tanks about this policy. What should be done . Generally, the government is a supporter. Not everybody in the government. Personally i have debated with them that they support it. Key positions in all of these places, but as i mentioned the general, use the first one but i know means thats the own do. I should mention to you mentioned a good point. I said the indication
Going to increase or enhance security, but our vulnerability, provided working reasons. Anyway, the us thought all was not going to help them achieve their objective. The number two issue of sanctions. Those were negotiated. Important. That impact of the economy. But they have not made us desperate. I was having a dinner with a colleague, and she asked me, can you take me to a place where i can see the impact of sanctions . I told her, if you ask picked meexpect me to take you to store the shelves are empty, such a place does not exist. But you are talking now with the much more Nuclear Capable iran. Secondgeneration, 10,000 and 1,000 kilograms of 20 percent enriched uranium. So that was not attracted to anyone. But two factors facilitated. Number one, the momentum. No one can plan to create the momentum. It just happens. It is not a planned phenomenon. Both the administration here, they use the momentum which happened because of these actions. In his campaign he said, you know, the li
None of the main figures in the party chose to stand for election and perhaps for wise reasons. The one candidate that emerged at the end was a relatively less wellknown personality in taiwan, who has recently been the deputy seek of the legislative uon. Before the Public Opinion poll to determine whether if she would qualify to be the Party Candidate was held, the party did not arrange any time when she would present her platform to the public. And so when the voters that were polled, not the voters, the people who were polled reacted to her, what were they reacting to . They were reacting to her personal story which is quite compelling and interesting, and they were reacting to personality as an outspoken and atypical kmt politician. When the poll was conducted, she surprised many people, including myself, and got a 46 support rate, which was well beyond the threshold that the party had set for a potential candidate. Shortly afterward, however, her poll numbers began to collapse. Why
Political type revolution, someone pointed out already that we have new generation of or maybe geographical changes. Do you characterize this coming election outcome, characterize it more by recuring political outcome or having coming together . Do you want to take that . Yeah. I think i already mentioned in my remark there that this election will obviously trigger a generational shift. That will clearly be the case with dpp or for the green camp as a whole. And also, a lot of people in their 30s or even late 20s, they have been very active in social movement and also grassroots organization. They will steadily climb up the ladder and become an important forces in shaping the electoral politics. It depends on how his party and his own turn out. Ing . He might be around for quite a while, if his party turns out to be a critical voting bloc, then you know. On the other hand, if in the end, a lot of the voters abandoned him in the very end and his party actually couldnt really play a very
The fact that there was a source that he met with on white house grounds is a key revelation today for days has not said anything a about who the source is, how he learned this information, whether or not this was the criticism has been whether it was engineered by the white house to help give the president some political cover as hes facing all these questions about that tweet that he issued a few weeks ago saying he had been wire. Tapped under the orders of president obama. He has not confirmed that but by suggesting there was some surveillance which picked up some trump team communications. To push back but today saying that his source he met with on white house ground and reviewed it at a nearby facility suggests that theres a a lot more to the story than was first publically revealed. Now spicer saying there were multiple sources, but we dont have any confirmation there was multiple sources. We only know theres one source and e he had to review this on a a classified facility and