our elections. it does not go to say his finance or whether what s in his tax returns or whether it was laundered money or all those kinds of things. those paths may not be fully explored by mueller so democrats may have reasons to continue this. i do think if mueller gives president trump a fairly clean review and finds no evidence of collusion, there is going to be a lot of pressure on democrats to limit other investigations and not just piling on. david and shan wu, thank you. coming up, we ll talk to amy klobachar. an already crowded field, getting larger and larger. when i kept finding myself smoking in my attic. dad!
have it in the end is mueller. back in the background here, what warner is saying, mueller has many pieces of this puzzle in his possession already than the senate intelligence committee has. therefore, we should wait and you can leave and by implications he s agreeing with burr that they have not seen anything so far but he s not saying that. does it matter that there ends up with no direct evidence collusion involving the president. plenty of convictions are based on circumstantial evidence and there are a number of people charged with crimes. absolutely, you can have an indictment, you don t have to have the smoking gun of the admission or the taped conversations. i agree with david, we are in the midst of this. they re still in the midst of things. they may never get to hear from
joining us, how intelligence committee, sean wu and david gargon. do you think it is going to come down with one set of facts leading to two different collusion s collusions? not really, i think we are still in the midst of the investigation. these two men is telling the truth. senator burr is saying we had tha lot of hearings and we have not seen any evidence of collusion. senator warren is staying silence and avoiding the question. what he s saying is we should not reach a conclusion. we don t have that so far. the guy who has it is going to
some of the witnesses such as flynn or manafort or gates because of their involvement of the criminal investigations. it is important for us to draw the distinction between how congress investigates verses how a criminal investigation proceeds. the criminal investigation almost focuses on the individual wrong doing at the end of the day. that s why the burden is so high beyond a reasonable doubt. they re both in search of the truth. congress is looking to uncover facts. it is a fact-finding mission is apart of their over sight then they can fulfill that mission by looking through the facts. they have been working diligently, hundreds of thousands of pages and a lot of witnesses interviewed. they can fulfill that mission by putting a more systematic review out, unlike the criminal investigation, at the end of the day, was there individual wrong doing or not? that s always a much more way to go. david, it is possible.