Project reappears on municipal planning body's website, with hearing date set for August 31; parks authority insists it has no plans to advance controversial initiative
While definition of the area as a national park does not allow expropriation of church property per se, the possibility of future development in the area would be severely limited by the new initiative
Plan to expand national park onto church-owned lands still appears on website of planning panel; parks authority: Project won't be advanced without dialogue with church leaders