Cspan was created as a Public Service by americas Cable Television companies, and is brought to you today by your paper satellite provider. [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2017] host in your code of ethics statement you write i am not an objective news reporter. Im in opinion columnist. Walt right. Host what does that mean . Walt i am like a movie reviewer. They are not objective. You dont look at the movie reviewer to read an objective business story about the studio. You go to read someones opinion about whether this is a good movie. Whether this actor did a good job or a bad job. Whether aaron sorkin did a good job writing it or david finch er did a good job directing it. I know people who avidly read a reviewer and then do exactly the opposite because they know they are going to disagree. I know other people who swear by this book reviewer, this television reviewer and follow their advice. That is what i have done most of my career. I am also a commentator. When
Everybody go. [gunfire] this new video obtained by the review journal shows the harrowing moments of the attack. To we have a Medical Center somewhere yet . Police have now pinpointed a more exact timeline. At 10 05 p. M. , paddock fired the first shots from the mandalay bay. Then the shooting stopped. At 10 18, paddock fired more than 200 rounds through the door of his room, wounding a Security Guard in the leg. After that, paddock fired no more bullets into the music festival. He may have had more in mind. You suggested that after he saw the Security Guard, his concern became himself. Was there any evidence he plan to survive this and escape . Yes. I cant tell you. At 11 20, police shoot used an explosive to get through his front door. Some of paddocks shots also hit the Aviation Fuel tanks on the edge of the airport. Investigators are trying to determine whether those were stray bullets or he intended the tanks. This guy is absolutely he boogeyman. The boogeyman. This guy used treme
They are not objective. You dont look at the movie objectiveo read an business story about the studio. You go to read someones opinion about whether this is a good movie. Whether this actor did a good job of or a bad job. Aaron sorkin did a good job writing it or david finch did a good job directing it. Read apeople who avidly reviewer and then do exactly the opposite because they know they are going to disagree. I know other people who swear by this book reviewer, this television reviewer and follow their advice. That is what i have done most of my career. I also a commentator. And i choose not to review a product, i often instead comment on an issue. The future of the internet, the behavior of the fcc. What google ought to be doing. What microsoft ought to be doing. Those are all opinions. I say that specifically so people will understand. I realized,e most of us has realized lots of readers dont get the distinction. I stated it up front. It doesnt mean i am in any way infallible. Im
Actor did a good job or a bad job or by their a particular actor did a good job or bad job, whether aaron sorkin did a good job writing it or david finch did a good job directing it or whatever. Its an opinion. I know people who actually avidly read a reviewers Movie Reviews or book reviews and do exactly the opposite because they know they will disagree with the person. They have different tastes. I know there are people who swear by this movie reviewer or television reviewer, whatever they are and they followed their advice. That is what i done most of my career. Paired when i choose not to review a product in a given week, i often instead comment on an issue. The future of the internet, the behavior of the fcc, what google ought to be doing, what microsoft got to be doing, what apple ought to be doing. The several opinions objectives. I say that specifically so people understand because there are people. Everybody in the Media Business gets this distinction. But i realized that most
To a hearing on the ideology behind violent extremism and what the u. S. Can do to counter it. Foreman National Counterterrorism center at director Michael Leiter testifies before the Senate Homeland security committee. Good morning. This hearing is to order. I want to thank the witnessesss for your testimony for taking the time for your courage. The mission of this committee is pretty straightforward. To enhance the economic and National Security of america and promote more efficient, effective and accountable government. The Committee Really is in respects to committees in one from the house side. We have Homeland Security and where governmental affairs. This hearing is really focusing on the Homeland Security side of the committee structure. And within that structure we have four priorities. Border security, cybersecurity, protecting critical infrastructure, and countering extremism and violence in any form, including islamist terrorism. What we try and do in this committee is due t