and officer, are ones that could lead to further fact finding by the colorado trial judge. if the court says, the standard of proof was wrong, or you need to follow the definition of insurrection, that could go back to the trial court for their findings. it s not clear exactly how the supreme court will do this to get an off ramp that gets this completely done with and gone for all persons. professor, can you help the supreme court to find a word officer in section three and the word insurrection? no, they will have to decide that for themselves. there is no precedent really. david blight pointed out, bush v. gore is pretty close, but there is no precedent for a presidential candidate being disqualified from office for reasons like this. so, there is no existing
historians david blight and eric foner will join us, next. hi, i m jason. i ve lost 228 pounds on golo. changing your habits is the only way that gets you to lose the weight. and golo is the plan that s going to help you do that. just take the first step, go to golo.com. [deep exhale]
there is no precedent really. david blight pointed out, bush v. gore is pretty close, but there is no precedent for a presidential candidate being disqualified from office for reasons like this. so, there is no existing definition in the jurisprudence that would directly relate to this case, but remember, in the election of 1876, soon after the 14th amendment, supreme court justices were involved and choosing the president then also, and as a lecture electoral commission was established, including five members of the supreme court, and a disputed presidential election. judges may pretty much very well liked the idea that they can choose the president.
this, passes it, punts it somehow, that we re still debating in this in september and october, then it becomes part of the election, one would think. david blight, eric foner, andrew weissmann, thank you all very much for joining us, we appreciate it. we ll be right back. we ll be right back. you feel, your risk of shingles sharply increases after age 50. but shingrix protects. proven over 90% effective, shingrix is a vaccine used to prevent shingles in adults 50 years and older. shingrix does not protect everyone and is not for those with severe allergic reactions to its ingredients or to a previous dose. an increased risk of guillain-barré syndrome was observed after getting shingrix. fainting can also happen. the most common side effects are pain, redness, and swelling at the injection site, muscle pain, tiredness, headache, shivering, fever, and upset stomach.
it was a referendum on the 14th amendment and it s meaning, and a referendum on reconstruction and devotes, returned a veto for a republican majority in congress, made possible the reconstruction act at the following year. i am not predicting that we will have a referendum on the 14th amendment, will have a referendum on trump s crimes, i suppose. who knows, if the court delays this, passes it, punts it somehow, that we re still debating in this in september and october, then it becomes part of the election, one would think. david blight, eric foner, andrew weissmann, thank you all very much for joining us, we appreciate it. we ll be right back.