seeing that the arguments in court that john sauer is saying that presidential immunity does not exist would be shocking and you would allow president biden maybe to be indicted in west texas to have a texas jury and judge as to how he has been handling the border, and this is not an argument that we are seeing being made by other figures and secretaries of state and other attorneys as well saying that it is essentially something that could be flipped in the future on a democratic president or something. kaitlan, it is a good question and i can understand it through the political lens, but i am not certainly sure it would hold legal water, and laura and david could better answer it, but this is my assumptions here. it is one thing to have the belief that the president should have some level of immunity to take actions without fear of
CNN Trump Immunity Appeal June 4, 2024 16:40:15
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
faithful execution of the presidential powers and what is that there are no legitimate execution of overturning the election, and this is venal power, and we have heard this in testimony subsequently, and he ignored it. so, that argument is flimsy at best. and the arguments put forward by the lawyer were effectively dismantled by the judges including a disturbing exchange of whether a president could use seal team six to kill a political rival and then avoid impeachment if he would be liable for impeachment. it is surreal stuff, but it is important. and david, i think that surreal is the right word and also, surreal to see it, but i have to point it out, and hold out, because we have the picture of where he is going to talk, and are you kidding? it is looking like the west wing, and is that intentional? i have to point out the obvious in what i am seeing. thank you very much.
entities, but i don t agree with that, and again, most americans if you ask the simple question, should the president be able to do whatever they want without any ability to be charged with the potential crime if they break the law, and most people would say no, the president is not above the law, and i think that is true. shermichael, and john and david, stick around and we will come back on the political aspect of this and unpacking it, for people saying, what is official and what is not. what can a president do in office and when is it campaigning and political and when it is just criminal. more in a moment.
and trump team has a great advance team. they do. it is right out of central casting. laura, i want to say that i am sure that you have heard, and this is elie when they were talking about this, and the judge said that use seal six team to kill a political opponent and that is never going to happen that it is an unlawful order of the military and when i heard her say that, do you not know the law yourself, because that is puzzling, but to john s point, it is what john is going to say, he was in search of the truth, and, right, and truth in his mind, and then this is the pandora s box again that is going to be made here in that setting that you just alluded to, that presidential-like setting, laura. but, david on that point, one of the reasons that the judge was asking the hypothetical and more than the seal team six, but could you sell pardons or sell military secrets and the point of the exchange was to suggest
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.