a group of senators, including more than half a dozen democrats apparently think that doesn t go far enough. that s giving momentum to a proposed bill that calls for the individual mandate to be delayed at least six months after the health care.gov website becomes fully functional. a lot to talk about with senator marco rubio. nice to have you back on the program. thanks for having me back. jenna: a lot to talk about. let s start with the first report. the president has told us repeatedly if we are an american who buys our own insurance, buys our own business and provides our own insurance for our families that we would be able to keep that insurance. now we re learning, according to reports, that the administration knew that for the majority of those americans, that would not be true. this is while the president is saying this to the american public. what s your reaction to that? well, this is by design. they always knew that and the reason why is they wanted to destroy the indivi
care for all americans. this has to be a part of the goal that all of you have. jenna: we re keeping an eye on the hearing. it s still going on. it s been two hours so far. there s still a lot to get to. as we ll go throughout the program, we ll dip in and out and bring our viewers that. i said this once or twice but it bears repeating. if you like your current insurance, you will keep your current insurance. no government takeover, nobody is changing what you ve got if you re happy with it. if you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. jon: you probably recall that s what the president promised in 2010 but at that very same time, the white house reportedly knew that millions of folks would end up losing their health coverage under obamacare. the white house has an explanation for that saying,
seeing the news shifting every couple weeks. you know, it makes me as a reporter want to find more information. neil: just don t email that request. thank you, great reporting on your part. it s all the buzz now. let s say not good and let s just say nod this. there is no spying on americans. we don t have a domestic spying program. neil: i guess it depends what the meaning of the word domestic spying program s peter says the nsa is indeed capable of spying on 75% of americans. we ve got to be 100% all over this and them. this is getting hairy now. what do you make of the latest revelations? well, what i make of these is this we re seeing the same thing we ve continued to see all summer which is that the administration and defenders of this program say one thing, then a couple weeks later, we find
do people then, with that news of gang violence in california, shootings in chicago, do they avoid places like that or places in the united states they will go to, or are they holding on offense? i think people on the fence whether they were thinking about going or not will not go but the people that were going to come will come. it s the same for americans, not as extreme at egypt but some people don t go to mexico because of the gang violence on the borders. neil: what about areas they avoid. i ve heard from friends, maybe i m not going to chicago. chicago s a fine city. they ve had increased violence but the knee-jerk reaction is, not now. people said the same thing about new york city in 2001 and it took a while for tourism to come back. we live here and we know what a
out what the defenders of the programs are saying is not true. you know, first we were told by the nsa s by senior officials at the nsa there was no mass collection of data on americans, then we found out that s exactly what happened. then we were told there was great oversight and zero violations of american s privacy. now we find out at one facility alone there were thousands of violations of american s privacy. we re told they are not collecting emails between americans, not reading the content. now we re seeing they are collecting and storing and in some cases analyzing the emails. over and over we are hit with revelations that have gone to the core of the arguments that the defenders of the nsa are making. neil: the nsa will come out and they have capability of getting this sort of stuff like