banking on against everybody on earth one, telling them something different. this is the thing they ve been clinging to and it is now being revealed and it is nothing? what do they could in response? soul searching is not probably the answer. self-reflection, humility, those are not usually the first things that happen. but as noted at the washington post today, there was one really handy bit of confirmation in this proclamation from mike lindell s cyber expert that he didn t actually have any data proving the election. when he made these comments saying lindell s data didn t prove the election was stolen, lindell confirmed to the washington times the source of this supposed data on which lindell has built this whole conspiracy theory. these months of rantings and ravings and fake documentaries and sim pose i can t and websites and exposes and all the
when he made these comments to the washington times that mike lindell s data didn t confirm anything. lindell s experts also confirmed the source of the supposed data on which lane dell has built this entire conspiracy theory and the months of ravings, and websites, and exposés, and all the rest of it, including the reinstatement and august fantasy. where did this day did come from that lindell has used for as his basis? while his cyber expert confirmed that the material that is the basis for these claims is provided by a man named dennis montgomery and i am guessing you do not recognize that name, but you might remember him from these headlines not long ago. the man who conned the pentagon. also, how a reno casino con man duped the cia and pulled one of the most dangerous hoaxes in
taxes to remain low as a very rich man. how does that connect with the majority of americans who are now starting to see their do their taxes realizing the big tax cut that helped howard schultz didn t help them. how can he justify the idea that just because he s really rich he should get deep tax cuts but the average american shouldn t be able to access universal health care? joy, what are you referring to when you said he wants to keep his taxes low? he made it clear he doesn t believe that taxes on people of his means should be increased. he wants to keep his tax cuts. he s said it over and over again. that s absolutely false. oh, he doesn t want to keep the tax cuts? if you look to the speech he gave a couple of days ago in indiana which you referenced at the top of this he said people like himself should pay more tax taxes. that s good to know. middle class americans should keep taxes low. would he accept the idea of a wealth tax which is what elizabeth warren is
perhaps in an effort to push back from the data this is your polling schultz s team released partial internal polling data. somewhat suspiciously the data didn t show the information the respondents were given to support him. the bottom line figure showed schultz drawing a whopping 17% of the national vote in a three-way race with trump and either kamala harris or elizabeth warren. the same figures showed trump beating both democrats 33 to 32%. schultz s own polling indicates he would lose badly and throw the race to trump. the independent polling is worse than that. how do you argue against the fact that your own polling shows the results of a howard schultz run for president would be a second term for donald trump? joy, we are two weeks into this conversation. there is a different way to look at the numbers which i think your viewers ought to consider. you used two words we ought to pay attention to certainly and guarantee. i think that anyone who thought
germany it s not in the interest of the european union it s even dangerous it would be disadvantages for our economy for the british economy for citizens rights but also sitting on the committee of interior affairs and we ve been discussing a lot about the issue of security lately europe poll i mean i cannot imagine a situation in which we just stop collaborating with the united kingdom first of april when it comes to security when it comes to exchanging data didn t allow us to catch terrorists we have to go on doing this and that s why we need a deal but we need a deal based on what s been go see it within the last two years when you see here you are you re saying that with the example of europe you re saying that we need the u.k. to remain as partnered with us as much as possible so it s in everyone s interest for some deal to be negotiated so then why not renegotiate the part about the irish bad start why does it have to be all or nothing because the backstop is plan b. i don t get