convince more than just their own side. yeah. daniel, do we have any idea when these transcripts could be forth coming? what kind of hoops do they have to go through before they can be released to the public? i m not sure. i haven t seen any specifics on that. i ve seen where the democrats want to get them to the public as soon as possible, but i haven t seen details on when precisely they plan to do so. no had i, that s why i m asking you guys. any of you have any idea? have you heard any idea how long it will take to get the transcripts released or what they would have to go through to get thm released? no? we ll have to wait until we get that. eugene, do you think it is a mistake for mueller to not subpoena the president as schiff has suggested? by saying that, do you get a sense that they are not satisfied with the direction of the mueller investigation? i think the point schiff is trying to make is the american people want as much information as possible. we know that the
investigation is a witch hunt and he is being honest. if he is being as truthful as he claims to be, in theory he should be able to testify under oath. that s schiff s argument. most americans who want to see this carried through to the logical conclusion are hoping that is what happens as well. whether that will happen we don t know. i m he not in a position to say whether or not what is best for mueller. this is something that he has far more experience doing than what i am doing, but i certainly think it would be odd to many americans if we get this far in the investigation and certainly to the point of completion and the president himself does not testify under oath. what about congressman shoif said this morning that the president has made over 1,000 false statements about specifically russia? how else but through a subpoena can the truth be found? yeah, it s certainly in the hundreds by my count, and we know, you know, the democrats want trump testifying under oath
statement, quote, as previously reported, the speaker s only message to the department was that it needed to comply with oversight requests and there were no terms set for its compliance, which i think means paul ryan is saying sorry, justice department, he s siding with nunes again. but there s one other person who got access to all those classified documents under the deal the justice department struck with nunes and that is the ranking democrat on the house intelligence committee, adam schiff and he sent us this statement. quote, access to the underlying materials used by the majority to produce its talking point memo was limited to the chairman or designee, that s nunes, ranking member, that s schiff and appropriate staff. the majority doesn t dispute this but makes the absurd claim that after reviewing the materials, the agreement did not preclude them from sharing it with any other members of congress. if that was true, there was no point to limiting access to the