it has its ups and downs and it s clearly on the point of radical dissolution, right now. what s going to replace it? whether it will evoke the same clamorous contingent of supporters that darwinism has evoked? i don t know. we ll see. a lot of sinister developments happening. big data is itself a response of a kind to the absence of theory and biology and psychology. mark: big data, the collection of health records, social tons and tons of data, together with artificial intelligence protect the data. if you don t understand what s going on, psychology, and if you don t understand what s going on in biology, heap together a ton of data and start looking at it. that s a response. that s something different. that was not expected. mark: uh-huh. i think a lot of our viewers hearing what you ve talked about in atheism, darwinism and
it. was it inevitable? mark: is that science, which is applied by the progressives, by the communists, political science, behavioral science, social science and so forth, ahead of their birth among others darwinism. are they amenable to rethinking these scientific theories from which they borrow in order to organize man? i don t think so. science progresses one funeral at a time. it s true. certain generation is going to die out. the next generation is going to be very careful about the kinds of claims they are make. darwinism is a movement, is an ideology, is a position and thought, and a triumphant creation is like any other movement or thought.
across the atlantic in order to mate? others are happy fornicating close to home. it worked for one seal, not the other. why aren t women born with tails like cats? well, women don t seem to need the tails, though it could make them more alluring than they are. why don t cats rule the world, considering they have every reason and every opportunity to do so? well, they re content being our domestic masters. the anecdotes pile on interminably and no fundamental leading principle. mark: do you find that most atheists, more prominent atheists embrace darwinism. every last one. mark: why do they do that? because it s a secular myth. even atheists need compelling myth how we got here, what we do here, what our purpose is. how we got here is an accident.
across the atlantic in order to mate? others are happy fornicating close to home. it worked for one seal, not the other. why aren t women born with tails like cats? well, women don t seem to need the tails, though it could make them more alluring than they are. why don t cats rule the world, considering they have every reason and every opportunity to do so? well, they re content being our domestic masters. the anecdotes pile on interminably and no fundamental leading principle. mark: do you find that most atheists, more prominent atheists embrace darwinism. every last one. mark: why do they do that? because it s a secular myth. even atheists need compelling myth how we got here, what we do here, what our purpose is. how we got here is an accident.
notion of progressivism and the old progressives who take a lot of the arguments from hagel and marx and woodrow wilson and dewey, they would attack the declaration, attack the constitution, this is old stuff. it s time to move along. all this is holy is profane, marx said. mark: do you think this darwinism, the push towards religion out of the public square, we got to clean it off out of the parks and schools. get rid of it. mark: wherever it is? yeah. mark: doesn t this undermine the foundational principles of the united states? probably. probably. but, look, let me put the point