The Delhi High Court has observed that advertising is a part of commercial speech recognized under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India and any restraint on such a right can be placed only.
In a design infringement suit by Havells, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday observed that when examining the aspect of design piracy from the point of view of visual appeal, it is the overall.
The Delhi High Court has ruled that mere global reputation or asserted goodwill of a trademark is not sufficient to answer claim of trans-border reputation.A division bench of Justice Yashwant Varma.
The high court was hearing a suo motu petition initiated by it pursuant to a reference by a single bench in a lawsuit filed by Tata Play concerning infringement of its trademark.
The senior counsel for the plaintiffs, Darpan Wadhwa, submitted that while the plaintiff had no objection to the use of the trademark Madhav the grievance was only with respect to the logo being adopted by the defendant which was deceptively similar to that of the plaintiffs., , delhi high court, pepsico